From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Rigg Subject: Re: Xrun stack trace for 1010LT Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:17:10 +0000 Message-ID: <20081205151709.GA3160@localhost> References: <21718.84876.qm@web65413.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail3.uklinux.net (mail3.uklinux.net [80.84.72.33]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5467024523 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:04:20 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21718.84876.qm@web65413.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Pete cat Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 06:48:43AM -0800, Pete cat wrote: > I understand. Im only a fairly basic C coder and such, so could you > recommend a tool which is fairly easy to use? Or would it be better > to revert to a non RT kernel (there did not seem to be much improvement > when I moved to the RT kernel)? FWIW I've never been able to run an RT-patched kernel with pcm_multi. I've been using a non-rt preempt SMP kernel with three Delta 1010s for about three years now without too many problems, currently with alsa-lib-1.0.16 and 2.6.25.x kernel. John