From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Rigg Subject: Re: Xrun stack trace for 1010LT Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:02:15 +0000 Message-ID: <20081205160215.GA3295@localhost> References: <227999.32830.qm@web65402.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <737104.16616.qm@web65414.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail3.uklinux.net (mail3.uklinux.net [80.84.72.33]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01515103805 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:49:26 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <737104.16616.qm@web65414.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Pete Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 07:23:00AM -0800, Pete wrote: > Is there likely to be any disadvantage to running arecord rather > than say Jack to capture? Does (say) Jack read the card in a 'better' > way? jackd runs with realtime priority if -R option is specified when starting it. Running it without -R produces xruns fairly often, but with -R they almost never happen on a properly configured system. I don't know if arecord can run with realtime priority. John