From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] EXPORTFS: Update the documentation and comments
	and adjust the types used [try #2]
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:59:29 -0500
Message-ID: <20081208235929.GE24083@fieldses.org>
References: <20081204193235.GD7575@fieldses.org> <20081203183033.2636.47937.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20081203183043.2636.27982.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <26023.1228468154@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: hch@infradead.org, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:54767 "EHLO fieldses.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753040AbYLHX7i (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:59:38 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <26023.1228468154@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 09:09:14AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> 
> > Could we get separate patches for these?
> 
> For every individual change?

No, I don't object to some degree of bundling together pure cleanups,
but this was getting a bit long.

In the case of a trivial patch I really like being able to look at the
description, look down at the patch, and see that it obviously does
what's described, without having to hunt around.

--b.