From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Serebrin <benjamin.serebrin@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] KVM: VMX: initialize TSC offset relative to vm creation time
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:45:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081211194505.GA5468@dmt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49415010.3000108@redhat.com>
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 07:38:24PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
>
>
>>> This looks fine, but have you tested it on a host with unsync tsc?
>>> I'm worried that we'll get regressions there even on uniprocessor
>>> guest. I'd like to keep the current behaviour for the special case
>>> of
>>> uniprocessor guest on unsync tsc host.
>>>
>>
>> I don't see how. For UP guests the TSC is initialized to zero during
>> vcpu setup, similarly to the current behaviour.
>>
>> Can you explain?
>>
>>
>
> On a host with an unsync tsc, when you move the vcpu to another cpu, the
> tsc may jump backwards.
Ok, this could cause the guest tsc to be initialized to a high value
close to wraparound (in case the vcpu is migrated to a cpu with negative
difference before vmx_vcpu_setup). What other regression could the
updated patch introduce?
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 97215a4..5b70d83 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ struct kvm_arch{
unsigned long irq_sources_bitmap;
unsigned long irq_states[KVM_IOAPIC_NUM_PINS];
+ u64 vm_init_tsc;
};
struct kvm_vm_stat {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index e446f23..0879852 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -856,11 +856,8 @@ static u64 guest_read_tsc(void)
* writes 'guest_tsc' into guest's timestamp counter "register"
* guest_tsc = host_tsc + tsc_offset ==> tsc_offset = guest_tsc - host_tsc
*/
-static void guest_write_tsc(u64 guest_tsc)
+static void guest_write_tsc(u64 guest_tsc, u64 host_tsc)
{
- u64 host_tsc;
-
- rdtscll(host_tsc);
vmcs_write64(TSC_OFFSET, guest_tsc - host_tsc);
}
@@ -924,6 +921,7 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 data)
{
struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
struct kvm_msr_entry *msr;
+ u64 host_tsc;
int ret = 0;
switch (msr_index) {
@@ -949,7 +947,8 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 data)
vmcs_writel(GUEST_SYSENTER_ESP, data);
break;
case MSR_IA32_TIME_STAMP_COUNTER:
- guest_write_tsc(data);
+ rdtscll(host_tsc);
+ guest_write_tsc(data, host_tsc);
break;
case MSR_P6_PERFCTR0:
case MSR_P6_PERFCTR1:
@@ -2111,7 +2110,7 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_setup(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
{
u32 host_sysenter_cs, msr_low, msr_high;
u32 junk;
- u64 host_pat;
+ u64 host_pat, tsc_this, tsc_base;
unsigned long a;
struct descriptor_table dt;
int i;
@@ -2239,6 +2238,12 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_setup(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
vmcs_writel(CR0_GUEST_HOST_MASK, ~0UL);
vmcs_writel(CR4_GUEST_HOST_MASK, KVM_GUEST_CR4_MASK);
+ tsc_base = vmx->vcpu.kvm->arch.vm_init_tsc;
+ rdtscll(tsc_this);
+ if (tsc_this < vmx->vcpu.kvm->arch.vm_init_tsc)
+ tsc_base = tsc_this;
+
+ guest_write_tsc(0, tsc_base);
return 0;
}
@@ -2331,8 +2336,6 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vmcs_write32(GUEST_INTERRUPTIBILITY_INFO, 0);
vmcs_write32(GUEST_PENDING_DBG_EXCEPTIONS, 0);
- guest_write_tsc(0);
-
/* Special registers */
vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, 0);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index ba10287..b2d64eb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -4122,6 +4122,8 @@ struct kvm *kvm_arch_create_vm(void)
/* Reserve bit 0 of irq_sources_bitmap for userspace irq source */
set_bit(KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID, &kvm->arch.irq_sources_bitmap);
+ rdtscll(kvm->arch.vm_init_tsc);
+
return kvm;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-11 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-09 1:12 [patch 0/3] synchronized TSC between vcpu's on SMP guests Marcelo Tosatti
2008-12-09 1:12 ` [patch 1/3] QEMU/KVM: x86: separate TSC load from kvm_arch_load_regs Marcelo Tosatti
2008-12-10 10:10 ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-09 1:12 ` [patch 2/3] QEMU/KVM: BIOS: revert TSC zeroing Marcelo Tosatti
2008-12-09 1:12 ` [patch 3/3] KVM: VMX: initialize TSC offset relative to vm creation time Marcelo Tosatti
2008-12-10 10:19 ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-10 16:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-12-11 17:38 ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-11 19:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2008-12-28 9:26 ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-09 11:38 ` [patch 0/3] synchronized TSC between vcpu's on SMP guests Michael Tokarev
2008-12-09 10:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-12-09 22:48 ` Michael Tokarev
2008-12-22 23:16 ` David S. Ahern
2008-12-28 9:33 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081211194505.GA5468@dmt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=benjamin.serebrin@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.