From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: mike@nauticaltech.com, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12201] New: long wait in call_usermodehelper() / queue_work() / wait_for_completion()
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:05:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081211230521.GA2392@ioremap.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081211225158.GA2169@ioremap.net>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 01:51:58AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov (zbr@ioremap.net) wrote:
> > > If I write a small pilot program that calls socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW,
> > > NETLINK_AUDIT), it will delay by 1-2 seconds 100% of the time (assuming server
> > > has been online for a while). Certain protocol types given to socket() have
> > > zero delay (because no module needs to be loaded).
> > >
> > > Steps to reproduce:
> > > Once server has been online for a while, a simple call to socket(PF_NETLINK,
> > > SOCK_RAW, NETLINK_AUDIT) shows the problem.
> >
> > OK, weird.
> >
> > Please get sysrq working then get us a task trace, so we can see who is
> > sleeping where. Do this:
> >
> >
> > - run your "small pilot program"
>
> Or send it to us and we will quickly fix the bug :)
>
> Thank you!
Btw, does this ugly hack fix the problem?
According to your description it may be the case.
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 480184a..2b64eb5 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -434,6 +434,10 @@ static int netlink_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol)
if (protocol < 0 || protocol >= MAX_LINKS)
return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
+#ifndef CONFIG_AUDIT
+ if (protocol == NETLINK_AUDIT)
+ return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
+#endif
netlink_lock_table();
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
if (!nl_table[protocol].registered) {
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-11 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-12201-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-12-11 22:37 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 12201] New: long wait in call_usermodehelper() / queue_work() / wait_for_completion() Andrew Morton
2008-12-11 22:48 ` Kay Sievers
2008-12-12 19:47 ` Michael Spiegle
2008-12-11 22:51 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-12-11 23:05 ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2008-12-12 19:51 ` Michael Spiegle
2008-12-12 19:42 ` Michael Spiegle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081211230521.GA2392@ioremap.net \
--to=zbr@ioremap.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike@nauticaltech.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.