From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: git log --numstat disagrees with git apply --numstat
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:53:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081211235337.GK32487@spearce.org> (raw)
I've found a case where git apply --numstat and git log --numstat
produce different results for the same commit.
In egit (git://repo.or.cz/egit.git/):
$ git log --numstat -1 --pretty=o 9bda5ece6806cd797416eaa47c
9bda5ece6806cd797416eaa47c7b927cc6e9c3b2 Teach RevWalk about ...
8 0 org.spearce.jgit/src/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/DateRevQueue.java
69 13 org.spearce.jgit/src/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevWalk.java
$ git log -p -1 --pretty=o 9bda5ece6806cd797416eaa47c | git apply --numstat
8 0 org.spearce.jgit/src/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/DateRevQueue.java
68 12 org.spearce.jgit/src/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevWalk.java
I found this because I was writing a unit test for JGit that ran
through the JGit project history and compared the output of git
log --numstat against the output of JGit's "git apply --numstat"
implementation, after scraping the "git log -p" output.
I can't quite figure out why log --numstat is coming up with a +1
difference here for both added and removed, but it is. I haven't
dug into the Git code yet to figure out why. FWIW, JGit produces
the same result as "git apply --numstat" (the 68/12).
At this point JGit was able to successfully read and match 715 of
1211 commits before it found this difference, so its also somewhat
rare to occur I think...
--
Shawn.
next reply other threads:[~2008-12-11 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-11 23:53 Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
2008-12-12 1:52 ` git log --numstat disagrees with git apply --numstat Jeff King
2008-12-12 2:08 ` Jeff King
2008-12-12 2:21 ` Jeff King
2008-12-15 9:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-15 20:32 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081211235337.GK32487@spearce.org \
--to=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.