From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:23:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20081212092308.GI25106@elte.hu> References: <20081211114154.5d420ff5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:55085 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758172AbYLLJXW (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:23:22 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Steven Rostedt * Fr=E9d=E9ric Weisbecker wrote: > > struct boot_trace_ret { > > - char func[KSYM_NAME_LEN]; > > + char func[KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN]; > > int result; > > unsigned long long duration; /* nsecs */ > > }; > > >=20 > Yes that's the right fix. The headers for the boot tracer have moved=20 > for 2.6.29 merge window and the fix should follow this move. If you=20 > agree, I will submit your patch to latest -tip with the right "from "= =20 > and "signed-off-by" tags.... i missed that bit indeed - so i've picked up your patch, thanks. Ingo