All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add command line init_start_cpus
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:18:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081213221842.583f1e38.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4944A279.5020009@kernel.org>

On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:06:49 -0800 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:

> 
> Impact: new command line
> 
> so could select cpus to be started during init stage
> 

Please always always always provide a description of the *reason* for
making a change to the kernel.  For patches other than bugfixes, this
is the most important part of the patch, because without a reason, why
should we even look at the code changes?

> 
> ---
>  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |   14 ++++++++++++++
>  init/main.c                         |   29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ linux-2.6/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -918,6 +918,20 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters.
>  		forcesac
>  		soft
>  
> +	init_start_cpus=	[KNL,SMP] set CPUs that will be started during
> +			init stage.
> +			Format:
> +			<cpu number>,...,<cpu number>
> +			or
> +			<cpu number>-<cpu number>
> +			(must be a positive range in ascending order)
> +			or a mixture
> +			<cpu number>,...,<cpu number>-<cpu number>
> +
> +			This option can be used to specify one or more CPUs
> +			to be started during init stage.
> +			<cpu number> begins at 0 and the maximum value is
> +			"number of CPUs in system - 1".

I can't even begin to imagine why would we want this feature.

>  	intel_iommu=	[DMAR] Intel IOMMU driver (DMAR) option
>  		off
> Index: linux-2.6/init/main.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/init/main.c
> +++ linux-2.6/init/main.c

Can we put this all somewhere else? init/main.c is a random dumping ground.

Perhaps kernel/cpu.c would be appropriate.  There's a bunch of other
cpumasky stuff in init/main.c which could also be moved into cpu.c
(and tidied up - it's a godawful ifdef mess).

> @@ -413,11 +413,35 @@ static void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(v
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA */
>  
> +static __initdata cpumask_var_t cpu_init_start_mask;
> +
> +/* Setup the mask of cpus configured for init start */
> +static int __init init_start_cpu_setup(char *str)
> +{
> +	cpulist_parse(str, *cpu_init_start_mask);
> +
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
> +__setup("init_start_cpus=", init_start_cpu_setup);
> +
>  /* Called by boot processor to activate the rest. */
>  static void __init smp_init(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned int cpu;
> +	struct cpumask *start_mask;
> +
> +	if (cpumask_empty(cpu_init_start_mask))
> +		start_mask = &cpu_present_map;
> +	else {
> +		start_mask = kmalloc(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL);

Why is this dynamically allocated?  I'd have though that a simple
__initdata static store would suit?


> +		if (!start_mask)
> +			start_mask = &cpu_present_map;
> +		else
> +			cpumask_and(start_mask, cpu_init_start_mask,
> +					 &cpu_present_map);
> +	}
>  	/*
>  	 * Set up the current CPU as possible to migrate to.
>  	 * The other ones will be done by cpu_up/cpu_down()
> @@ -426,13 +450,16 @@ static void __init smp_init(void)
>  	cpu_set(cpu, cpu_active_map);
>  
>  	/* FIXME: This should be done in userspace --RR */
> -	for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> +	for_each_cpu_mask_nr(cpu, *start_mask) {
>  		if (num_online_cpus() >= setup_max_cpus)
>  			break;
>  		if (!cpu_online(cpu))
>  			cpu_up(cpu);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (start_mask != &cpu_present_map)
> +		kfree(start_mask);
> +


  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-14  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-14  6:06 [PATCH] add command line init_start_cpus Yinghai Lu
2008-12-14  6:18 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-12-14  7:28   ` [PATCH] add init_start_cpus to config boot cpus -v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-12-14  9:55     ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-15  0:11 ` [PATCH] add command line init_start_cpus Andi Kleen
2008-12-15  3:39   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-16 21:18     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081213221842.583f1e38.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.