From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
kenchen@google.com,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: broken do_each_pid_{thread,task}
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:09:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081215170937.GA24080@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081215104716.GB11106@redhat.com>
On 12/15, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 12/14, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> > Although seeing the unexpected corner case it gets us into I think it would
> > be good to reconsider this test.
So. I can't decide whether this patch is cleanup or the further
uglification, but if anyone likes it I will be happy to send it.
Then we can kill do_each_pid_task/while_each_pid_task completely.
Oleg.
--- linux-2.6.27/include/linux/pid.h~PID_FOR_EACH 2008-10-10 00:13:53.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.27/include/linux/pid.h 2008-12-15 17:51:50.000000000 +0100
@@ -144,21 +144,25 @@ static inline pid_t pid_nr(struct pid *p
pid_t pid_nr_ns(struct pid *pid, struct pid_namespace *ns);
pid_t pid_vnr(struct pid *pid);
+/*
+ * Both old and new leaders may be attached to the same pid in the
+ * middle of de_thread(), that is why we do the special check for
+ * PIDTYPE_PID below.
+ */
+#define pid_for_each_task(pid, type, p) \
+ for (p = (pid) ? (void*)(pid)->tasks[type].first : NULL; \
+ rcu_dereference(p) && ({ \
+ prefetch(((struct hlist_node*)p)->next); \
+ p = hlist_entry((void*)p, typeof(*p), pids[type].node); \
+ 1; }); \
+ p = ((type) != PIDTYPE_PID) ? \
+ (void*)(p)->pids[type].node.next : NULL)
+
#define do_each_pid_task(pid, type, task) \
do { \
- struct hlist_node *pos___; \
- if (pid != NULL) \
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu((task), pos___, \
- &pid->tasks[type], pids[type].node) {
+ pid_for_each_task(pid, type, task)
- /*
- * Both old and new leaders may be attached to
- * the same pid in the middle of de_thread().
- */
#define while_each_pid_task(pid, type, task) \
- if (type == PIDTYPE_PID) \
- break; \
- } \
} while (0)
#define do_each_pid_thread(pid, type, task) \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-15 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-14 21:59 broken do_each_pid_{thread,task} Jiri Slaby
2008-12-15 1:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-12-15 10:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-15 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-02-24 13:22 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-24 15:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-24 16:21 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-24 21:49 ` [RFC, PATCH] introduce pid_for_each_task() to replace do_each_pid_task() Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-15 10:24 ` broken do_each_pid_{thread,task} Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-15 10:50 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-12-15 11:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-15 11:33 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-12-15 11:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-10-12 10:55 ` Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081215170937.GA24080@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=kenchen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.