From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: linux-next: lblnet tree build failure Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:33:48 -0500 Message-ID: <200812161133.48529.paul.moore@hp.com> References: <20081216191419.43ae28af.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from g1t0027.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.34]:48093 "EHLO g1t0027.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755509AbYLPQeO (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:34:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081216191419.43ae28af.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Casey Schaufler On Tuesday 16 December 2008 3:14:19 am Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: > > security/smack/smackfs.c: In function 'smk_netlabel_audit_set': > security/smack/smackfs.c:118: error: 'struct task_struct' has no > member named 'security' > > Caused by commit 2d22b59c5401e60c04e6258a245b8a99d103f55b ("smack: > Add support for unlabeled network hosts and networks") interacting > with commit b6dff3ec5e116e3af6f537d4caedcad6b9e5082a ("CRED: Separate > task security context from task_struct") from the security-testing > tree. This latter commit is also in the lblnet tree (since it merges > the security testing tree). > > I have dropped the lblnet tree for today. My mistake, it should be fixed now. When I was updating the lblnet-2.6_next tree yesterday I made a mistake and didn't refresh Casey's patch completely when merging it against the security-testing tree as a result some of the necessary merges didn't make it out of my local directory. Sorry guys. -- paul moore linux @ hp