From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers
<containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman"
<ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] keys: play nicely with user namespaces
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:37:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081219143726.GA10939@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10350.1229685462-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Quoting David Howells (dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org):
> Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > So far the design is that user namespaces are disjoint with one specific
> > exception.
> >
> > The user who creates the user namespace is expected to have god like powers
> > over all users in the created user namespace.
>
> I see.
>
> > When carefully implemented will allow a user namespace to be created with
> > normal user permissions and for the user that created user namespace to
> > manage the resources owned by users in that user namespace.
>
> I'm not sure how to deal with this wrt keys. There are two problems to
> consider:
>
> (1) Should a key with UID 500 from namespace A in Serge's example be visible
> in namespace B?
Conceptually that'd be nice, but it seems unnecessary since (IIUC)
userspace in the child userns can always reload the key. So then
we can leverage the intricate fs controls (where in fact a file may
be owned by (A,500) and (B,0) simultaneoushly, or by (A,500) with
no visibility by (B,0), while keeping the keys access controls simpler.
That's why I'm keeping them strictly separate in the current patchset.
If that turns out to be too simplistic, then we can always enable
cross-userns visibility later.
> If such a key should show up in namespace B, should its UID be given as 0
> to userspace?
That is the model we want for filesystem, but I'm really hoping we can
keep the keys model simpler.
> (2) How is the quota controlled? Do new keys made up under the domain of
> namespace B go to namespace B UID 0's quota? Or do they come out of
> namespace A's UID 500 quota?
Ideally it would be both. Since the namespaces are hierarchical, the
requirement of safe unprivileged user-namespace cloning should hold
in a child user-ns too, so at each level we want keys being counted
toward the quota of the acting (uid,userns) as well as that of each
(uidX,usernsX) up the creator chain.
-serge
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-19 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-11 23:23 [PATCH 0/3] keys: play nicely with user namespaces Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20081211232323.GA8343-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-11 23:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] keys: distinguish per-uid keys in different namespaces Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-11 23:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] keys: consider user namespace in key_permission Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-11 23:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] keys: skip keys from another user namespace Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-12 12:51 ` [PATCH 0/3] keys: play nicely with user namespaces David Howells
[not found] ` <3507.1229086294-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-12 14:17 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20081212141707.GB9571-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-12 15:57 ` David Howells
[not found] ` <25987.1229097458-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-12 16:22 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-17 23:55 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20081212162220.GA15520-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-12 16:42 ` David Howells
[not found] ` <26177.1229100126-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-12 17:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20081212173312.GA19085-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-12 18:38 ` David Howells
[not found] ` <28464.1229107090-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-12 19:31 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20081217235536.GA932-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-18 1:03 ` David Howells
2008-12-18 13:46 ` David Howells
[not found] ` <3547.1229607983-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-18 17:46 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20081218174613.GA13968-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-19 0:56 ` David Howells
[not found] ` <7376.1229648192-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-19 1:45 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20081219014555.GA25688-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-19 2:30 ` David Howells
[not found] ` <7658.1229653824-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-19 9:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <m1r6447csx.fsf-B27657KtZYmhTnVgQlOflh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-19 11:17 ` David Howells
[not found] ` <10350.1229685462-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-19 14:37 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081219143726.GA10939@us.ibm.com \
--to=serue-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.