From: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check return from argv_split() in do_coredump().
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:06:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081226150653.GD3156@hack.private> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812260700.mBQ70uH3009595@www262.sakura.ne.jp>
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 04:00:56PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>Hello.
>
>Am^[$(D+1rico Wang wrote:
>> How about going to the line:
>>
>> current->fsuid = fsuid;
>>
>> ? Because when argv_split() fails, helper_argv is NULL and doesn't need
>> to be checked again.
>
>I didn't understand what you say. I'm saying that
>"do_coredump() may accesss helper_argv[0] when helper_argv == NULL",
>which will result in "NULL pointer dereference" problem.
>Yes, this problem unlikely happens. Thus,
>
>if (!helper_argv)
> goto fail_unlock;
>
>may be enough.
>
Yes, goto fail_unlock will go to this line:
if (helper_argv)
argv_free(helper_argv);
but in this situation, helper_argv is known as NULL, thus another
check doesn't need. So we can go to the line below, i.e.
fail_unlock:
if (helper_argv)
argv_free(helper_argv);
current->fsuid = fsuid; //<=== goto this line
coredump_finish(mm);
You need to add a new label, of course. :)
--
"Against stupidity, the gods themselves, contend in vain."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-26 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-24 6:16 [PATCH] Check return from argv_split() in do_coredump() Tetsuo Handa
2008-12-26 14:45 ` Américo Wang
2008-12-26 7:00 ` Tetsuo Handa
2008-12-26 15:06 ` Américo Wang [this message]
2008-12-26 13:20 ` Tetsuo Handa
2008-12-26 13:54 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081226150653.GD3156@hack.private \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.