From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: RFC: "Virtual" native and sdk recipes
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:25:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090101182526.GF7040@smtp.west.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1230827114.5320.42.camel@dax.rpnet.com>
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 04:25:14PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Its nice to try something a bit different occasionally. For a long time
> the mechanical repetitive nature of -native and -sdk recipes has
> bothered me and people have talked about getting rid of them since
> forever. I've had ideas floating around on how to address this for a
> while and I now have a proper proposal and better still a proof of
> concept.
I'll read the whole thing again later, but in working on the canadian
SDK stuff (*poke*) I've been thinking why don't we just build the "SDK"
packages for building our own stuff? gcc/etc are relocatible if we
build them right...
--
Tom Rini
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-01 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-01 16:25 RFC: "Virtual" native and sdk recipes Richard Purdie
2009-01-01 18:11 ` Koen Kooi
2009-01-01 20:07 ` Richard Purdie
2009-01-01 18:25 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2009-01-01 20:11 ` Richard Purdie
2009-01-01 22:02 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-02 1:11 ` Richard Purdie
2009-01-02 4:37 ` Native/Cross/SDK rethink (Was: Re: RFC: "Virtual" native and sdk recipes) Tom Rini
2009-01-05 14:31 ` Esben Haabendal
2009-01-05 15:42 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-05 17:29 ` Koen Kooi
2009-01-05 19:53 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-06 20:51 ` Esben Haabendal
2009-01-07 0:14 ` Richard Purdie
2009-01-07 0:45 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-08 22:59 ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-01-09 0:54 ` RFC: "Virtual" native and sdk recipes Richard Purdie
2009-01-09 1:16 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-12 19:09 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-12 20:30 ` Esben Haabendal
2009-01-09 17:04 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-12 20:47 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-10 15:33 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-10 19:06 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-14 1:15 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-14 23:17 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-17 2:54 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-17 4:47 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-22 18:10 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-28 19:49 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-01 22:15 ` Tom Rini
2009-01-01 23:19 ` Richard Purdie
2009-01-03 11:17 ` Richard Purdie
2009-01-02 12:58 ` Koen Kooi
2009-01-14 0:03 ` Robert Schuster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090101182526.GF7040@smtp.west.cox.net \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.