From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20081230 - S390 - tape drive fails to build with !CONFIG_BLOCK Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:01:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20090102100159.GA4730@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <20081231033039.f203b59c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081231112132.GA4268@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mtagate3.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.136]:34618 "EHLO mtagate3.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755541AbZABKCD (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 05:02:03 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081231112132.GA4268@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Kamalesh Babulal Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 04:51:32PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > next-20081230 randconfig build fails on S390, with CONFIG_BLOCK=n > > Adding the dependency of CONFIG_BLOCK to CONFIG_S390_TAPE_BLOCK > > Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal > --- a/drivers/s390/char/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/s390/char/Kconfig > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ comment "S/390 tape interface support" > > config S390_TAPE_BLOCK > bool "Support for tape block devices" > - depends on S390_TAPE > + depends on S390_TAPE && BLOCK Thank you, added it to our patch queue.