From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
mingo@elte.hu, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] fastboot: make scsi probes asynchronous
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:13:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090104101353.05e8df09@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090104180515.GD2002@parisc-linux.org>
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:05:15 -0700
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 09:29:40AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > >From 2087b546abddced50fa73ea9a71b5a040ae1026e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > >2001
> > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:32:28 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] fastboot: make scsi probes asynchronous
> >
> > This patch makes part of the scsi probe (which is mostly device
> > spin up and the partition scan) asynchronous. Only the part that
> > runs after getting the device number allocated is asynchronous,
> > ensuring that device numbering remains stable.
>
> Is this really a big win? Were you using the async scsi scan code
> already?
just checked;
my box has CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y set for both cases
it seems to be about 0.1 seconds win still though...
sounds little, but a kernel boot should be less than a second, so that
is still 10%. And it's obviously also disk dependent..
(I used libata connected disks obviously)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-04 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-04 17:24 [PATCH 0/4] Fastboot revisited: Asynchronous function calls Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 17:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] fastboot: Asynchronous function calls to speed up kernel boot Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-04 18:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 18:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 19:05 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-04 19:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 19:49 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-04 19:52 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-04 17:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] fastboot: make scsi probes asynchronous Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 18:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-01-04 18:13 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2009-01-04 18:38 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-04 18:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 17:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] fastboot: make the libata port scan asynchronous Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 17:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] fastboot: make ACPI bus drivers probe asynchronous Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-05 2:03 ` Zhao Yakui
2009-01-05 1:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-05 2:51 ` Zhao Yakui
2009-01-05 2:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-05 5:30 ` Zhao Yakui
2009-01-04 18:16 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fastboot revisited: Asynchronous function calls Linus Torvalds
2009-01-04 18:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-04 19:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-04 19:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-05 16:21 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 21:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-05 21:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-04 19:11 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-04 19:46 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-04 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-04 19:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 21:44 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-11 13:14 ` Pavel Machek
2009-01-05 6:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-01-05 8:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-05 10:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-05 11:18 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-01-07 2:41 ` Shaohua Li
[not found] <fa.h0UoSd20jEtik35h1v63j+E67Io@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.5PP24JO26n+WYiDr/9b4OySGjWY@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.FlPVm6dv2aVhxgrZlA92A/26QC8@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.xSdAPowIDNEH2rL6hWZp0t33p2U@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.abMnCBprOI1BL1RNVaAvYnUsaEw@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.opIcflAvDANLuO5+8NjVCjt/94o@ifi.uio.no>
2009-01-04 18:55 ` [PATCH 2/4] fastboot: make scsi probes asynchronous Sitsofe Wheeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090104101353.05e8df09@infradead.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.