From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589BCDDF94 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:01:24 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:01:22 +0300 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/83xx: Add PCI-E support for all MPC83xx boards with PCI-E Message-ID: <20090105180122.GA12237@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <20081229164040.GD8215@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20081230201916.GA20059@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <1F7739C2-930B-49C1-B8FF-679AF1BBAEAE@kernel.crashing.org> <20081231171017.6FCF585AD247@gemini.denx.de> <20090105174645.GA23766@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 In-Reply-To: <20090105174645.GA23766@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Wolfgang Denk Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:46:45AM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: [...] > > My statement was to convey that the kernel.org kernel should only > > worry itself with the denx.de u-boot (w/regards to compatibility). > > Why? Unless the BSP u-boots do something insane, I think we should try > to have the upstream kernel boot on the u-boot that comes on the board > (it's not nice to require users to reflash unnecessarily). Just in case, the latest version of this patch set is compatible with the FSL u-boots. Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2