All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>,
	Karl Auerbach <karl@iwl.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, karl@cavebear.com,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@mkp.net>
Subject: Re: Some IDE issues with 2.6.28 on PC-Engines ALIX2
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:38:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901051838.37608.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090105171935.4e0c077e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>

On Monday 05 January 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Both are done by block layer.  The former is controlled by the user-space
> > while the latter is controlled by the block driver.
> 
> And in the old IDE case erroneously set for any device reporting CFA via
> the kernel. Queue flag management belongs in user space because its far
> more complex than you seem to think to get it right.

Please stop playing straw man in almost every your mail.  Doing it once
in a while can be intriguing or even enjoyable but doing it on daily basis
kills any sensible debate...

There is nothing incorrect in setting non-rotational queue flag for CF
devices [1] and I wasn't suggesting where it should belong -- I was solely
describing how things look up currently.

[1] in fact some SSD devices present themselves as CF devices

Thanks,
Bart

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-05 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-05  0:37 Some IDE issues with 2.6.28 on PC-Engines ALIX2 Karl Auerbach
2009-01-05  3:01 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-01-05 12:44   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-05 13:33     ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 17:47       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-05 18:04         ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 18:44     ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-01-05 11:36 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 23:23   ` Karl Auerbach
2009-01-05 23:27     ` Alan Cox
2009-01-06 12:58     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-06 19:21       ` Alan Cox
2009-01-06 19:54         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-05 12:08 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-05 16:36   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-05 16:52     ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 17:15       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-05 17:19         ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 17:38           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-01-05 18:00             ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 18:10               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-05 22:41     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-11 17:47       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-31 21:03         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-02-01 16:16           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-31 11:25 Christoph .J Thompson
2009-01-31 12:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-01-31 14:15   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-31 14:58     ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-01-31 14:42 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-31 16:27   ` Christoph .J Thompson
2009-01-31 16:35     ` Mark Lord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200901051838.37608.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=karl@cavebear.com \
    --cc=karl@iwl.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkp@mkp.net \
    --cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.