From: "W. van den Akker" <listsrv@wilsoft.nl>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Still problems to get ath9k in accessmode. Kernel hangs
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:32:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901062132.04403.listsrv@wilsoft.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901061552.45729.listsrv@wilsoft.nl>
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 15:52:45 you wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009, you wrote:
> > On Monday 05 January 2009, you wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 02:44:20PM +0100, W. van den Akker wrote:
> > > > I have tested on the server with the latest wireless-testing the
> > > > past days (2.6.28-rc9-wl). The wireless-testing looks somewhat more
> > > > stable then the compat-wireless.
> > > >
> > > > I have also installed the netconsole module to watch any kernel
> > > > prints. After running hostapd (v0.6.6) from command line the AP is
> > > > up-and-running. Then if I connect with the laptop (tested it with
> > > > kernel .26 and .28 on the laptop) I get a connection and can start a
> > > > browser en explore the internet. If I start a second session (Kmail
> > > > or second browser) the
> > > > server hangs within a minute. Leaving again no trace on the console,
> > > > hostapd-log or netconsole.
> > >
> > > Just to make sure I understood this correctly.. Does this happen with
> > > just a single association station (your laptop)? What are you referring
> > > to with a "session"? Just another program using network (i.e., no new
> > > wireless associations, etc.)? As far as the ath9k driver is concerned,
> > > new applications (e.g., new TCP connection) should not really matter
> > > much.. If you have IEEE 802.11n enabled, could you please run a test
> > > with it disabled to make sure this is not related to frame aggregation?
> > >
> > > As far as getting any output from the system is concerned, the next
> > > step could be to see if NMI watchdog would be able to provide any help.
> > > Please take a look at Documentation/nmi_watchdog.txt in the kernel
> > > source code and see if you could use that on the AP to get some output
> > > when the system hangs (running without X on console to make sure you
> > > see the output).
> >
> > Hi Jouni,
> >
> > Yes you understood correctly. Only a laptop, start a browser then start
> > Kmail over the same wireless connection. Then it hangs. This is always
> > reproducable. There are also other sorts or hangups (for example when
> > starting hostapd, but that is not always reproducable when it happens).
> >
> > I will try today the watchdog-suggestion. Hope that it will provide some
> > help.
>
> I have enabled the NMI_watchdog (see below)
> CPU0 CPU1
> 0: 322372 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 12 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 4: 101 0 IO-APIC-edge serial
> 6: 3 0 IO-APIC-edge floppy
> 7: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge parport0
> 8: 2 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc0
> 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
> 12: 4 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 16: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb1
> 17: 6282 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi eth1
> 18: 364152 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ata_piix, ata_piix, eth0
> 19: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb2
> 21: 1727 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ath
> 23: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb3
> 27: 89 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi aic79xx
> NMI: 322364 322307 Non-maskable interrupts
> LOC: 0 322302 Local timer interrupts
> RES: 10695 24691 Rescheduling interrupts
> CAL: 36 112 Function call interrupts
> TLB: 2371 3165 TLB shootdowns
> TRM: 0 0 Thermal event interrupts
> SPU: 0 0 Spurious interrupts
> ERR: 0
> MIS: 0
>
> However, after starting a internet session and Kmail session the server
> hangs again without any output. Does the NMI-handler not process per CPU?
> So if one CPU hangs, the other would still proceed?
>
> I have no 802.11n enabled, nor X.
>
> This means I think the system halted hard 'hlt-instruction'
>
> Any further suggestion? I am little bit hopeless now. I have placed the PCI
> card into another slot, no result.
Some additional information:
I have booted the server at approx 16:00. Hostapd was started at boot-time.
After 5 hours without any connection from any computers the server hangs.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-01 13:44 Still problems to get ath9k in accessmode. Kernel hangs W. van den Akker
2009-01-03 13:56 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-05 9:41 ` Jouni Malinen
2009-01-06 7:57 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-06 14:52 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-06 20:32 ` W. van den Akker [this message]
2009-01-06 20:51 ` pat-lkml
2009-01-06 22:42 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-07 15:42 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-10 11:26 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-10 19:50 ` pat-lkml
2009-01-12 7:47 ` W. van den Akker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-24 9:40 W. van den Akker
2008-12-24 10:07 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-12-24 17:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901062132.04403.listsrv@wilsoft.nl \
--to=listsrv@wilsoft.nl \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.