From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernd Schubert Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] time needs to be adjusted when eh was running Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:09:15 +0100 Message-ID: <200901071909.16310.bs@q-leap.de> References: <200811261840.45360.bs@q-leap.de> <200811261929.25959.bs@q-leap.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ns2.q-leap.de ([88.79.172.217]:43687 "EHLO mail.q-leap.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753930AbZAGSJS (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200811261929.25959.bs@q-leap.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: James Bottomley James, you rejected the patches 1/7 and 2/7, but what about the other patches? Especially [PATCH 5/7] time needs to be adjusted when eh was running [PATCH 6/7] SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command used fixed value are important for us. Thanks, Bernd -- Bernd Schubert Q-Leap Networks GmbH