From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759417AbZAGUw6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:52:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754157AbZAGUwu (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:52:50 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:41852 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753632AbZAGUwu (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:52:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 21:52:29 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Mike Travis Cc: Ingo Molnar , Rusty Russell , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jack Steiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] cpumask: more cpumask updates Message-ID: <20090107205229.GB4597@elte.hu> References: <20090107195832.265117000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090107195832.265117000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Mike Travis wrote: > > One big change to irq_desc and a few smaller maintenance type updates. > > cpumask: update irq_desc to use cpumask_var_t > cpumask: Use topology_core_cpumask()/topology_thread_cpumask() > cpumask: convert misc driver functions > cpumask: convert drivers/net/sfc > cpumask: convert other misc kernel functions > > Based on tip/cpus4096: v2.6.28-5703-g1d1a70e > > (Ingo - I added a blank line before the From: part and that seems to > separate it from the Subject. Hopefully your git-am will still > recognizes it - I did try a git-am here and it seemed to work ok.) > > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis Since you have it in a Git tree, why dont you send me a pull request? I might be more picky about pull requests in general (because it's harder to fix up a pulled tree than to fix up commits that come from emails - and it's also more work for you if i refuse to pull than if i have some comments over email-patches), but it's a much better (more scalable) workflow in the long run than the email path. Ingo