From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:58:52 +0100 From: Boris Dores Message-ID: <20090108075852.GU10913@via.ecp.fr> References: <0598BD8415F140D9BE986E3AB9FFF35F@lzheng> <49639295.9060309@candelatech.com> <83475D0A79834C4C964DFE7F73FABFFD@lzheng> <49640E77.2090108@candelatech.com> <66223B09B0EC4F6EA1D9B74E39C0E215@lzheng> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <66223B09B0EC4F6EA1D9B74E39C0E215@lzheng> Subject: Re: [Bridge] vlan and bond integration in bridge List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Lv Zheng Cc: Bridge Linux On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:47:58AM (GMT+0800), Lv Zheng wrote: > +---------------------------+-----------------+ > | br0 | br1 | > +------------------+--------------------------+ > | bond0.1 | eth2.1 | eth3.2 | eth4.2 | > +------------------+--------+--------+--------+ > | bond0 | eth2 | eth3 | eth4 | > +---------+--------+ | | | > | eth0 | eth1 | | | | > +---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ >=20 > It looks good for port based VLAN. Thanks. For port based VLAN, I think it should rather simply be : +---------------------------+-----------------+ | br0 | br1 | +------------------+--------+--------+--------+ | bond0 | eth2 | eth3 | eth4 | +---------+--------+ | | | | eth0 | eth1 | | | | +---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ without the VLAN layer, otherwise packets will be tagged. --=20 Boris Dor=E8s