All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Linux NFS ML <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [patch 07/14] sunrpc: Make the global queue_lock per-cache-detail.
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:25:17 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090108082603.870223000@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090108082510.050854000@sgi.com

The data structures it's protecting are all contained by the
cache_detail, so having a global lock is unnecessary and potentially
a performance limitation.

Signed-off-by: Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>
---

 include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h |    2 +
 net/sunrpc/cache.c           |   48 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

Index: bfields/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h
===================================================================
--- bfields.orig/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h
+++ bfields/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <asm/atomic.h>
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
 
 /*
  * Each cache requires:
@@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ struct cache_detail {
 	int			entries;
 
 	/* fields for communication over channel */
+	spinlock_t		queue_lock;
 	struct list_head	queue;
 	struct proc_dir_entry	*proc_ent;
 	struct proc_dir_entry   *flush_ent, *channel_ent, *content_ent;
Index: bfields/net/sunrpc/cache.c
===================================================================
--- bfields.orig/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ bfields/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -359,6 +359,7 @@ int cache_register(struct cache_detail *
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 	rwlock_init(&cd->hash_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&cd->queue_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cd->queue);
 	spin_lock(&cache_list_lock);
 	cd->nextcheck = 0;
@@ -672,7 +673,6 @@ void cache_clean_deferred(void *owner)
  *
  */
 
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(queue_lock);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(queue_io_mutex);
 
 struct cache_queue {
@@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ cache_read(struct file *filp, char __use
 	mutex_lock(&queue_io_mutex); /* protect against multiple concurrent
 			      * readers on this file */
  again:
-	spin_lock(&queue_lock);
+	spin_lock(&cd->queue_lock);
 	/* need to find next request */
 	while (rp->q.list.next != &cd->queue &&
 	       list_entry(rp->q.list.next, struct cache_queue, list)
@@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ cache_read(struct file *filp, char __use
 		list_move(&rp->q.list, next);
 	}
 	if (rp->q.list.next == &cd->queue) {
-		spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&cd->queue_lock);
 		mutex_unlock(&queue_io_mutex);
 		BUG_ON(rp->offset);
 		return 0;
@@ -723,13 +723,13 @@ cache_read(struct file *filp, char __use
 	BUG_ON(rq->q.reader);
 	if (rp->offset == 0)
 		rq->readers++;
-	spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&cd->queue_lock);
 
 	if (rp->offset == 0 && !test_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &rq->item->flags)) {
 		err = -EAGAIN;
-		spin_lock(&queue_lock);
+		spin_lock(&cd->queue_lock);
 		list_move(&rp->q.list, &rq->q.list);
-		spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&cd->queue_lock);
 	} else {
 		if (rp->offset + count > rq->len)
 			count = rq->len - rp->offset;
@@ -739,26 +739,26 @@ cache_read(struct file *filp, char __use
 		rp->offset += count;
 		if (rp->offset >= rq->len) {
 			rp->offset = 0;
-			spin_lock(&queue_lock);
+			spin_lock(&cd->queue_lock);
 			list_move(&rp->q.list, &rq->q.list);
-			spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
+			spin_unlock(&cd->queue_lock);
 		}
 		err = 0;
 	}
  out:
 	if (rp->offset == 0) {
 		/* need to release rq */
-		spin_lock(&queue_lock);
+		spin_lock(&cd->queue_lock);
 		rq->readers--;
 		if (rq->readers == 0 &&
 		    !test_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &rq->item->flags)) {
 			list_del(&rq->q.list);
-			spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
+			spin_unlock(&cd->queue_lock);
 			cache_put(rq->item, cd);
 			kfree(rq->buf);
 			kfree(rq);
 		} else
-			spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
+			spin_unlock(&cd->queue_lock);
 	}
 	if (err == -EAGAIN)
 		goto again;
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ cache_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table
 	if (!rp)
 		return mask;
 
-	spin_lock(&queue_lock);
+	spin_lock(&cd->queue_lock);
 
 	for (cq= &rp->q; &cq->list != &cd->queue;
 	     cq = list_entry(cq->list.next, struct cache_queue, list))
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ cache_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table
 			mask |= POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
 			break;
 		}
-	spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&cd->queue_lock);
 	return mask;
 }
 
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ cache_ioctl(struct inode *ino, struct fi
 	if (cmd != FIONREAD || !rp)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	spin_lock(&queue_lock);
+	spin_lock(&cd->queue_lock);
 
 	/* only find the length remaining in current request,
 	 * or the length of the next request
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ cache_ioctl(struct inode *ino, struct fi
 			len = rq->len - rp->offset;
 			break;
 		}
-	spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&cd->queue_lock);
 
 	return put_user(len, (int __user *)arg);
 }
@@ -871,9 +871,9 @@ cache_open(struct inode *inode, struct f
 		rp->offset = 0;
 		rp->q.reader = 1;
 		atomic_inc(&cd->readers);
-		spin_lock(&queue_lock);
+		spin_lock(&cd->queue_lock);
 		list_add(&rp->q.list, &cd->queue);
-		spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&cd->queue_lock);
 	}
 	filp->private_data = rp;
 	return 0;
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ cache_release(struct inode *inode, struc
 	struct cache_detail *cd = PDE(inode)->data;
 
 	if (rp) {
-		spin_lock(&queue_lock);
+		spin_lock(&cd->queue_lock);
 		if (rp->offset) {
 			struct cache_queue *cq;
 			for (cq= &rp->q; &cq->list != &cd->queue;
@@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ cache_release(struct inode *inode, struc
 			rp->offset = 0;
 		}
 		list_del(&rp->q.list);
-		spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&cd->queue_lock);
 
 		filp->private_data = NULL;
 		kfree(rp);
@@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ static const struct file_operations cach
 static void cache_remove_queued(struct cache_detail *cd, struct cache_head *h)
 {
 	struct cache_queue *cq;
-	spin_lock(&queue_lock);
+	spin_lock(&cd->queue_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(cq, &cd->queue, list)
 		if (!cq->reader) {
 			struct cache_request *rq = container_of(cq, struct cache_request, q);
@@ -936,13 +936,13 @@ static void cache_remove_queued(struct c
 			if (rq->readers != 0)
 				continue;
 			list_del(&rq->q.list);
-			spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
+			spin_unlock(&cd->queue_lock);
 			cache_put(rq->item, cd);
 			kfree(rq->buf);
 			kfree(rq);
 			return;
 		}
-	spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&cd->queue_lock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1073,9 +1073,9 @@ static int cache_make_upcall(struct cach
 	rq->buf = buf;
 	rq->len = PAGE_SIZE - len;
 	rq->readers = 0;
-	spin_lock(&queue_lock);
+	spin_lock(&cd->queue_lock);
 	list_add_tail(&rq->q.list, &cd->queue);
-	spin_unlock(&queue_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&cd->queue_lock);
 	wake_up(&queue_wait);
 	return 0;
 }

--
-- 
Greg Banks, P.Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group.
the brightly coloured sporks of revolution.
I don't speak for SGI.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-08  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-08  8:25 [patch 00/14] sunrpc: Sunrpc cache cleanups and upcall rework Greg Banks
2009-01-08  8:25 ` [patch 01/14] sunrpc: Use consistent naming for variables of type struct cache_detail* Greg Banks
2009-01-08  8:25 ` [patch 02/14] sunrpc: Use consistent naming for variables of type struct cache_head* Greg Banks
2009-01-08  8:25 ` [patch 03/14] sunrpc: Use consistent naming for variables of type struct cache_request* Greg Banks
2009-01-08  8:25 ` [patch 04/14] sunrpc: Minor indentation cleanup in cache.c Greg Banks
2009-01-08  8:25 ` [patch 05/14] sunrpc: Rename queue_loose() to cache_remove_queued() Greg Banks
2009-01-08  8:25 ` [patch 06/14] sunrpc: Gather forward declarations of static functions in cache.c Greg Banks
2009-01-08  8:25 ` Greg Banks [this message]
2009-01-08  8:25 ` [patch 08/14] sunrpc: Make the global queue_wait per-cache-detail Greg Banks
2009-01-08  8:25 ` [patch 09/14] sunrpc: Remove the global lock queue_io_mutex Greg Banks
2009-01-08  8:25 ` [patch 10/14] sunrpc: Reorganise the queuing of cache upcalls Greg Banks
2009-01-08 19:57   ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-09  2:40     ` Greg Banks
     [not found]       ` <4966B92F.8060008-cP1dWloDopni96+mSzHFpQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-09  2:57         ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-09  3:12           ` Greg Banks
     [not found]             ` <4966C0AB.7000604-cP1dWloDopni96+mSzHFpQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-09 16:53               ` Chuck Lever
2009-01-10  1:28                 ` Greg Banks
2009-01-09 21:29         ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-09 21:41           ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-09 23:40             ` Greg Banks
2009-01-09 23:29           ` Greg Banks
2009-01-08  8:25 ` [patch 11/14] sunrpc: Allocate cache_requests in a single allocation Greg Banks
2009-01-08  8:25 ` [patch 12/14] sunrpc: Centralise memory management of cache_requests Greg Banks
2009-01-08  8:25 ` [patch 13/14] sunrpc: Move struct cache_request to linux/sunrpc/cache.h Greg Banks
2009-01-08  8:25 ` [patch 14/14] sunrpc: Improve the usefulness of debug printks in the sunrpc cache code Greg Banks
2009-01-08 19:52 ` [patch 00/14] sunrpc: Sunrpc cache cleanups and upcall rework J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-09  1:42   ` Greg Banks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090108082603.870223000@sgi.com \
    --to=gnb@sgi.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.