From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:54:50 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/3] hwmon: (k8temp) fix temperature Message-Id: <20090109155450.199ceb6d@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <20081215231213.GC7013@alberich.amd.com> In-Reply-To: <20081215231213.GC7013@alberich.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:41:02 +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:34:39PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > If you apply the same offset to all sensors, you'll still obtain > > something odd: > >=20 > > k8temp-pci-00c3 > > Adapter: PCI adapter > > Core0 Temp: > > +38=B0C > > Core0 Temp: > > +24=B0C > > Core1 Temp: > > +42=B0C > > Core1 Temp: > > +26=B0C > >=20 > > That's not terribly realistic, is it? Unless both sensors for a given > > core are very far apart - > > but I suspect each core is pretty small, > > isn't it? >=20 > "Far" is relative, isn't it ;-) >=20 > Guess this is from an idle system. > Please bring load on both cores and look at the temperature > differences again. Well that's not my system, so I can't do the tests. But next time someone reports with a rev.G K8, we'll ask him/her. --=20 Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors