From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: cpw@sgi.com, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix test/prefered v2
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:18:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090110061809.GD26290@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090110055408.GC26290@one.firstfloor.org>
> Fix test/prefered
>
> Couple of bugs here:
>
> - First the kernel errors out of the nodemask is < MAXNUMNODES,
> so have to discover that at runtime. There's no function
> in libnuma for this (perhaps there should be one?), so i
> wrote one here.
> - The loop set the node in the wrong mask, breaking the test
Sorry that was the broken version, here's a v2 with a actually
working max_numnode. The older version happened to work
on my test system, but was obviously not correct.
---
Fix test/prefered v2
Couple of bugs here:
- First the kernel errors out of the nodemask is < MAXNUMNODES,
so have to discover that at runtime. There's no function
in libnuma for this (perhaps there should be one?), so i
wrote one here.
- The loop set the node in the wrong mask, breaking the test
v2: Correct max_numnode detection
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
--- numactl-2.0.2/test/prefered.c 2008-08-05 16:36:58.000000000 +0200
+++ numactl-2.0.2-hack/test/prefered.c 2009-01-10 07:00:16.000000000 +0100
@@ -6,20 +6,38 @@
#include <assert.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <errno.h>
#define err(x) perror(x),exit(1)
+/* Discover MAXNUMNODE of the kernel */
+int max_numnode(void)
+{
+ int v;
+ unsigned size = 64;
+ struct bitmask *mask = numa_bitmask_alloc(size);
+ while (get_mempolicy(NULL, mask->maskp, mask->size, &v, MPOL_F_ADDR) < 0 &&
+ errno == EINVAL) {
+ numa_bitmask_free(mask);
+ size <<= 1;
+ mask = numa_bitmask_alloc(size);
+ }
+ numa_bitmask_free(mask);
+ return size;
+}
+
int main(void)
{
int max = numa_max_node();
+ int maxmask = max_numnode();
struct bitmask *nodes, *mask;
int pagesize = getpagesize();
int i;
int pol;
int node;
int err = 0;
- nodes = numa_bitmask_alloc(max+1);
- mask = numa_bitmask_alloc(max+1);
+ nodes = numa_bitmask_alloc(maxmask);
+ mask = numa_bitmask_alloc(maxmask);
for (i = max; i >= 0; --i) {
char *mem = mmap(NULL, pagesize*(max+1), PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
@@ -33,8 +51,8 @@
numa_bitmask_clearall(nodes);
numa_bitmask_clearall(mask);
- numa_bitmask_setbit(mask, i);
+ numa_bitmask_setbit(nodes, i);
if (mbind(adr, pagesize, MPOL_PREFERRED, nodes->maskp,
nodes->size, 0) < 0)
err("mbind");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-10 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-10 5:54 [PATCH] Fix test/prefered Andi Kleen
2009-01-10 6:18 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-15 15:18 [PATCH] Fix test/prefered v2 Cliff Wickman
2009-01-16 1:44 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090110061809.GD26290@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.