From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add b+tree library
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:13:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090111031337.GI31579@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090110220135.GF20611@logfs.org>
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:01:35PM +0100, Jörn Engel wrote:
>
> I don't really expect a big difference, even if the filesystem is
> intended for flash, not disks. Other overhead will dominate the
> picture. The situation may be different for Johannes, though.
If there isn't a big difference, is it really worth it to have both
rbtrees and b-trees in the kernel? Especially given the disadvantages
akpm noted....
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-11 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-10 10:47 [PATCH] add b+tree library Johannes Berg
2009-01-10 11:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-10 11:37 ` Johannes Berg
2009-01-10 11:56 ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-10 12:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-10 18:39 ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-10 18:44 ` Johannes Berg
2009-01-10 19:41 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-10 20:22 ` Johannes Berg
2009-01-10 20:23 ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-10 21:27 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-10 22:01 ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-10 22:23 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-10 23:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-11 8:30 ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-12 16:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-05 0:17 ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-05 8:46 ` Andi Kleen
2009-02-07 12:26 ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-11 3:13 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2009-01-10 22:26 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-11 8:20 ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-11 18:23 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-17 17:53 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090111031337.GI31579@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.