From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] ACPICA: move common private headers under kernel/acpi/acpica/ Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:09:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20090111040911.GH28520@elte.hu> References: <526647e1bb69fd3248558fce365bb1fbfb226ccd.1230719795.git.len.brown@intel.com> <20090102191451.GB14249@elte.hu> <20090107221017.GD17917@elte.hu> <20090108160304.GA30619@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:55079 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751808AbZAKEKJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:10:09 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner * Len Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:10:17PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > i still tend to regard kernel/* as the core Linux kernel, as code that can > > > be improved infinitely (only subject to the laws of physics), without > > > having to worry about how the ACPI spec wants certain things done. > > I want to move the Linux-ACPI code and the ACPICA core out of drivers/ > simply because they are not drivers, and never will be. which files are these exactly, in Linus's latest tree? Ingo