From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: Allowing more than 64k connections and heavily optimize bind(0) time. Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:52:06 +0300 Message-ID: <20090111125206.GA24173@ioremap.net> References: <20081224190926.GA3244@ioremap.net> <20081225212928.GA12038@ioremap.net> <20090110105931.GB358@ioremap.net> <20090110.232019.98466627.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from cs-studio.ru ([195.178.208.66]:34861 "EHLO tservice.net.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751397AbZAKMwJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:52:09 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090110.232019.98466627.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:20:19PM -0800, David Miller (davem@davemloft.net) wrote: > > I'm getting out from the vacations tomorrow and will try to more > > extensively test the patch (QA group found a bug in ipv6 side, but that > > was with the .24 backported patch, current one does not have that codepath > > iirc). But I would like to know if this worth it. > > I'll look at it at some point but it won't make this merge window, > sorry. Ok, please drop me a not and if things are good, merge the patch into the appropriate tree for the next window when time permits. -- Evgeniy Polyakov