From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Dieter Ries <clip2@gmx.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: travis@sgi.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc1 does not boot
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:02:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090111190218.GA18651@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496A3F62.8090902@gmx.de>
* Dieter Ries <clip2@gmx.de> wrote:
> Bisected it:
>
> ####################################################################
> 7503bfbae89eba07b46441a5d1594647f6b8ab7d is first bad commit
> commit 7503bfbae89eba07b46441a5d1594647f6b8ab7d
> Author: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
> Date: Sun Jan 4 05:18:09 2009 -0800
>
> cpumask: use work_on_cpu in acpi-cpufreq.c for drv_read and drv_write
>
> Impact: use new cpumask API to reduce stack usage
thanks, this is very helpful!
Mike, most of the work_on_cpu() patches you did so far were rather
problematic. Especially something like cpufreq can run rather early during
bootup or during suspend/resume, so i'm not sure it's correct to rely on
keventd for it.
I dont see anything particularly wrong in the commit itself - but
obviously it causes this boot hang - if the bug is not found we'll revert
it .
Also, this bit in get_cur_val():
+ if (unlikely(!alloc_cpumask_var(&cmd.mask, GFP_KERNEL)))
+ return 0;
how is that supposed to work? If we fail to allocate a cpumask we just
ignore the call silently? That cannot be right. (but has no connection to
this boot problem)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-11 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-11 14:55 2.6.29-rc1 does not boot Dieter Ries
2009-01-11 15:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11 15:30 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-11 15:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11 15:41 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-11 18:50 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-11 19:02 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-11 19:30 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-12 10:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 17:53 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-12 18:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-15 0:54 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-11 19:02 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-01-11 19:14 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-11 23:19 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-12 1:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-12 11:22 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-01-12 11:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 11:28 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-01-12 12:10 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-12 12:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 16:37 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-12 18:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-13 4:45 ` Michal Jaegermann
2009-01-12 17:22 ` 2.6.29-rc1 does not boot and fails to resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-14 1:16 ` 2.6.29-rc1 does not boot Rusty Russell
2009-01-14 11:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 12:47 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-15 20:01 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-15 21:03 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-15 21:48 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-01-15 21:54 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-15 23:04 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-01-15 23:31 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-15 21:54 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-15 23:02 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-15 23:30 ` Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090111190218.GA18651@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=clip2@gmx.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.