From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-mm@kvack.org, mel@csn.ul.ie,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.28-git-4 - powerpc - kernel expection 'c01 at .kernel_thread'
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:07:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090112083734.GB8409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901120907.20418.rjw@sisk.pl>
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> [2009-01-12 09:07:19]:
> On Monday 12 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> [2009-01-11 01:08:19]:
> >
> > > On Friday 02 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > 2.6.28-git4 kernel drops to xmon with kernel expection. Similar kernel
> > > > expection was seen next-20081230 and next-20081231 and was reported
> > > > earlier at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/31/157
> > >
> > > Is this a regression from 2.6.27?
> > >
> > > Rafael
> > >
> >
> > This is not a regression from 2.6.27, this expection was first seen
> > next-20081230 patches and then was introduced into 2.6.28-git4 and is
> > reproducible with 2.6.28-rc1 kernel.
>
> Presumably you meant 2.6.29-rc1 ? In which case it would be a regression from
> 2.6.28 . Please confirm.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
sorry, I meant it was introduced in 2.6.28-git4 and is still reproducible
with 2.6.29-rc1.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM, ISTL.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mel@csn.ul.ie
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.28-git-4 - powerpc - kernel expection 'c01 at .kernel_thread'
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:07:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090112083734.GB8409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901120907.20418.rjw@sisk.pl>
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> [2009-01-12 09:07:19]:
> On Monday 12 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> [2009-01-11 01:08:19]:
> >
> > > On Friday 02 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > 2.6.28-git4 kernel drops to xmon with kernel expection. Similar kernel
> > > > expection was seen next-20081230 and next-20081231 and was reported
> > > > earlier at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/31/157
> > >
> > > Is this a regression from 2.6.27?
> > >
> > > Rafael
> > >
> >
> > This is not a regression from 2.6.27, this expection was first seen
> > next-20081230 patches and then was introduced into 2.6.28-git4 and is
> > reproducible with 2.6.28-rc1 kernel.
>
> Presumably you meant 2.6.29-rc1 ? In which case it would be a regression from
> 2.6.28 . Please confirm.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
sorry, I meant it was introduced in 2.6.28-git4 and is still reproducible
with 2.6.29-rc1.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM, ISTL.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mel@csn.ul.ie
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.28-git-4 - powerpc - kernel expection 'c01 at .kernel_thread'
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:07:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090112083734.GB8409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901120907.20418.rjw@sisk.pl>
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> [2009-01-12 09:07:19]:
> On Monday 12 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> [2009-01-11 01:08:19]:
> >
> > > On Friday 02 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > 2.6.28-git4 kernel drops to xmon with kernel expection. Similar kernel
> > > > expection was seen next-20081230 and next-20081231 and was reported
> > > > earlier at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/31/157
> > >
> > > Is this a regression from 2.6.27?
> > >
> > > Rafael
> > >
> >
> > This is not a regression from 2.6.27, this expection was first seen
> > next-20081230 patches and then was introduced into 2.6.28-git4 and is
> > reproducible with 2.6.28-rc1 kernel.
>
> Presumably you meant 2.6.29-rc1 ? In which case it would be a regression from
> 2.6.28 . Please confirm.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
sorry, I meant it was introduced in 2.6.28-git4 and is still reproducible
with 2.6.29-rc1.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM, ISTL.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-12 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-02 12:57 [BUG] 2.6.28-git-4 - powerpc - kernel expection 'c01 at .kernel_thread' Kamalesh Babulal
2009-01-02 12:57 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2009-01-02 12:57 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2009-01-11 0:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 0:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-11 0:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-12 7:21 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2009-01-12 7:21 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2009-01-12 7:21 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2009-01-12 8:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-12 8:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-12 8:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-12 8:37 ` Kamalesh Babulal [this message]
2009-01-12 8:37 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2009-01-12 8:37 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2009-01-12 8:42 ` 赵赵萍
2009-01-12 8:50 ` How to unsubscribe, Was: " Simon Kagstrom
2009-01-12 8:42 ` 赵赵萍
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090112083734.GB8409@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.