From: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <rdenis@simphalempin.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Michael Stone <michael@laptop.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Network privilege separation.
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:30:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901122230.25976.rdenis@simphalempin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090112203931.GD23848@one.firstfloor.org>
Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 22:39:31 Andi Kleen, vous avez écrit :
> > What's the point of writing a parser (that could also have bugs) when the
>
> Sorry you lost me. What do you mean with parser here?
>
> > kernel can do it?
>
> And what does it have to do with the kernel?
The parser at the other end of the pipe. The more intricate the over-the-pipe
protocol is, the more likely it is to be buggy and the security scheme to
break.
> > A normal DVD would be over 30 megabytes per seconds once decoded, just
> > for the
>
> On many modern systems 30MB/s copies is nothing ... Also in this
> case they tend to be cache hot, which makes them much cheaper.
> Yes it would be somewhat slower, but if it avoids a couple of security
> updates that would be probably worth it.
If codecs did not care about performance, they'd be written in some high-level
language that could easily be sandboxed by its own VM.
As the guy who's been dealing with VLC security issues for the past two years,
I have to say, I am in no way interested in SECCOMP as it _currently_ is.
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-12 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-07 5:48 RFC: Network privilege separation Michael Stone
2009-01-07 5:48 ` [PATCH] Security: Implement and document RLIMIT_NETWORK Michael Stone
2009-01-07 11:47 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-07 16:52 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2009-01-07 17:48 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-07 20:54 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2009-01-07 20:54 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2009-01-07 21:42 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-07 18:35 ` C. Scott Ananian
2009-01-07 19:02 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-07 19:39 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-07 21:07 ` Michael Stone
2009-01-07 21:59 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-08 0:56 ` Michael Stone
2009-01-08 4:27 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-08 1:22 ` James Morris
2009-01-08 3:34 ` Michael Stone
2009-01-07 21:10 ` RFC: Network privilege separation Andi Kleen
2009-01-08 2:31 ` Michael Stone
2009-01-08 3:10 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-08 4:51 ` Michael Stone
2009-01-08 5:41 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-08 7:05 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-01-08 7:52 ` david
2009-01-08 10:43 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-12 18:44 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-12 19:09 ` Bryan Donlan
2009-01-12 19:43 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-12 19:47 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2009-01-12 20:14 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-12 20:15 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2009-01-12 20:27 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-12 20:39 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-12 20:30 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont [this message]
2009-01-12 20:55 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-12 20:47 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2009-01-12 21:50 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-13 8:06 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-08 12:08 Herbert Xu
2009-01-08 12:10 Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901122230.25976.rdenis@simphalempin.com \
--to=rdenis@simphalempin.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@laptop.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.