From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:10:25 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/linux In-Reply-To: <20090113000541.GA32708@cloud.net.au> References: <20090109063009.8E640768C5@busybox.osuosl.org> <87hc48rg53.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20090113000541.GA32708@cloud.net.au> Message-ID: <20090113071025.72bb816e@hcegtvedt> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:05:41 +1100 Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 10:19:04AM +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > >>>>> "ulf" == ulf writes: > > Silently selecting something as big and with so many configuration > > options as U-Boot isn't that nice - I think it would be nicer to > > depend on UBOOT instead. > > Isn't it possible(likely?) that users would have their own U-Boot or > have a pre-built one and don't need to compile it with buildroot, yet > still want to generate uImages? > Yes, but they still need mkimage. And, AFAIK, U-Boot does not support building the tools without loading a configuration. U-Boot could default to a known to compile default... Instead of like now where it defaults to $(BOARD_NAME)_config or something similar. -- Best regards, Hans-Christian Egtvedt