From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [78.47.116.26] (helo=drlauer-research.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LMsEM-0001g8-2d for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:59:30 +0100 Received: from andromeda.vanille.de (e180184168.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.184.168]) by drlauer-research.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA7B584186 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:13:27 +0100 (CET) From: "Michael 'Mickey' Lauer" Organization: Vanille-Media To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:52:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200901132011.00353.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <200901132023.37777.mickey@vanille-media.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200901132352.56407.mickey@vanille-media.de> Subject: Re: HAL and Xserver X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:59:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Am Tuesday 13 January 2009 20:51:26 schrieb Koen Kooi: > On 13-01-09 20:23, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > > Am Tuesday 13 January 2009 20:10:59 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz: > >> Hi > >> > >> Current x11-image depends on 'angstrom-x11-base-depends' which adds HAL. > >> For one customer I am building images with 1.3.0.0 xserver-kdrive so HAL > >> is not required at all (not to mention that it does not find any devices > >> when mdev is used instead of udev). > >> > >> I created patch which removes HAL from 'angstrom-x11-base-depends' and > >> moves it into dependencies of xserver-(kdrive,xorg) newer then 1.3.0.0. > >> > >> What do you think about it? > > > > Sounds good. I'd even welcome if we could disable it for all versions. > > You can't, it's needed to get input devices nowadays, there's a 3 month > long flamewar about it on the xorg mailinglists if you want some > background on it. Thanks. That's very unfortunate, but hey... source is out there, I can patch it out. -- :M: