From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1LNava-00072r-Hl for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:43:09 +0000 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:43:04 +1100 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 + 2] kexec updates Message-ID: <20090115224302.GI9114@verge.net.au> References: <20090112062359.GK7337@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Milton Miller Cc: Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev list , "M. Mohan Kumar" , kexec@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:59:08AM -0600, Milton Miller wrote: > On Jan 12, 2009, at 12:24 AM, Simon Horman wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 02:42:38PM -0600, Milton Miller wrote: >>> Follwing this mail are 5 patches for kexec userspace and two for the >>> kernel. The first fixes an array overflow and the second updates >>> userspace to the merged 2.6.28 kdump support. The remaining are >>> cleanups and warning fixes, including one for the common code. >>> >>> The two patchs for the kernel are independent. >> >> Hi all, >> >> sorry to be a bit slow in responding, this email landed just >> as I was leaving for a weeks holiday. >> > > No problem, I figured as much. > >> The kexec-tools patches seem reasonable to me and I'm happy to merge >> what I >> think are the latest versions - thanks Michael for your review. >> >> Milton, here are the Subjects, Dates and Message-Ids of what I have in >> my >> queue. If you could confirm this or repost that would be great. >> >> #1 >> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools v2] ppc64: always check number of ranges >> when adding them >> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:33:50 -0600 >> Message-ID: <1231418030_141769@mercury.realtime.net> >> >> #2 >> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 2/5] ppc64: update kdump for 2.6.28 >> relocatable kernel >> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:42 -0600 >> Message-Id: >> >> #3 >> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 3/5] ppc64: segments may be reordered >> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:45 -0600 >> Message-Id: >> >> #4 >> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 4/5] ppc64: cleanups >> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:48 -0600 >> Message-Id: >> >> #5 >> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 5/5] entry wants to be void * >> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:51 -0600 >> Message-Id: > > Based on the subjects, yes, those are the lastest versions. > > And I assume you saw Mohan's tested message. Thanks. I've added a "Tested-by: M. Mohan Kumar " tag to each of the five patches and applied them. -- Simon Horman VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: www.valinux.co.jp/en _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net (kirsty.vergenet.net [202.4.237.240]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D40ADE345 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:43:05 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:43:04 +1100 From: Simon Horman To: Milton Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 + 2] kexec updates Message-ID: <20090115224302.GI9114@verge.net.au> References: <20090112062359.GK7337@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: linuxppc-dev list , kexec@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:59:08AM -0600, Milton Miller wrote: > On Jan 12, 2009, at 12:24 AM, Simon Horman wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 02:42:38PM -0600, Milton Miller wrote: >>> Follwing this mail are 5 patches for kexec userspace and two for the >>> kernel. The first fixes an array overflow and the second updates >>> userspace to the merged 2.6.28 kdump support. The remaining are >>> cleanups and warning fixes, including one for the common code. >>> >>> The two patchs for the kernel are independent. >> >> Hi all, >> >> sorry to be a bit slow in responding, this email landed just >> as I was leaving for a weeks holiday. >> > > No problem, I figured as much. > >> The kexec-tools patches seem reasonable to me and I'm happy to merge >> what I >> think are the latest versions - thanks Michael for your review. >> >> Milton, here are the Subjects, Dates and Message-Ids of what I have in >> my >> queue. If you could confirm this or repost that would be great. >> >> #1 >> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools v2] ppc64: always check number of ranges >> when adding them >> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:33:50 -0600 >> Message-ID: <1231418030_141769@mercury.realtime.net> >> >> #2 >> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 2/5] ppc64: update kdump for 2.6.28 >> relocatable kernel >> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:42 -0600 >> Message-Id: >> >> #3 >> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 3/5] ppc64: segments may be reordered >> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:45 -0600 >> Message-Id: >> >> #4 >> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 4/5] ppc64: cleanups >> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:48 -0600 >> Message-Id: >> >> #5 >> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 5/5] entry wants to be void * >> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:51 -0600 >> Message-Id: > > Based on the subjects, yes, those are the lastest versions. > > And I assume you saw Mohan's tested message. Thanks. I've added a "Tested-by: M. Mohan Kumar " tag to each of the five patches and applied them. -- Simon Horman VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: www.valinux.co.jp/en