All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Eggner <edvx1@systemanalysen.net>
To: SGI Project XFS mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: xfs regression in linux_2.6.28, "XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO at line 3327 of file fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c"
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:08:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901161008.02387.edvx1@systemanalysen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090115221438.GF8071@disturbed>

On Thursday Jan 15th 2009 at 23:14:38 Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 04:02:39AM +0100, Roland Eggner wrote:
> > Latest (so far) working linux_2.6.27.9
> > linux_2.6.28 seems to introduce a xfs regression:
> 
> You mean 2.6.29, don't you (i.e. a current TOT development kernel,
> not a stable kernel)?
I meant exactly what I have written:  linux_2.6.28

> We have received a few reports of that since 2.6.29-git2 after the
> big XFS merge occurred. Can you confirm that you are running a very
> recent unstable kernel and not a stable 2.6.28 kernel?
all 2.6.28 builds which I have tried so far are broken,
today tried linux_2.6.29-rc1 and got the same "XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO .."
note:  SAME failure with
linux_2.6.28
linux_2.6.28-git7
linux_2.6.28-git9
linux_2.6.29-rc1

Should I compile with CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG?

If you know a 2.6.28 or 2.6.29 kernel with REALLY stable xfs:
please point me :-)

> BTW, I note your kernel is tainted (like a couple of other
> reports of this problem). Can you tell us what module you are
> running that taints the kernel so we can correlate that with
> other reports of the problem?
kernels vanilla from kernel.org
+ NVIDIA-Linux-x86-96.43.09 graphics driver
+ from loop-aes-source the kernel-2.6.27 patch
+ following patch required because of the new credentials framework
--- drivers/block/loop.c.orig   2009-01-11 00:55:28.000000000 +0100
+++ drivers/block/loop.c        2009-01-11 01:07:44.525441742 +0100
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@
         unsigned char b[64];
     } un;

-    if(lo->lo_key_owner != current->uid && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+    if(lo->lo_key_owner != current_uid() && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
         return -EPERM;

     m = (AESmultiKey *)lo->key_data;
@@ -2360,7 +2360,7 @@
        int err;
        struct loop_func_table *xfer = NULL;

-       if (lo->lo_encrypt_key_size && lo->lo_key_owner != current->uid &&
+       if (lo->lo_encrypt_key_size && lo->lo_key_owner != current_uid() &&
            !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
                return -EPERM;
        if ((unsigned int) info->lo_encrypt_key_size > LO_KEY_SIZE)
@@ -2416,7 +2416,7 @@
        if (info->lo_encrypt_key_size) {
                memcpy(lo->lo_encrypt_key, info->lo_encrypt_key,
                       info->lo_encrypt_key_size);
-               lo->lo_key_owner = current->uid;
+               lo->lo_key_owner = current_uid();
        }

        lo->lo_queue->make_request_fn = loop_make_request_real;


I believe problem is xfs related, because only xfs partitions with write
activity are affected, and the first error line in kernel log was in EVERY case
"XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO ..".  It seems that the loop module does not matter,
because both plane xfs partitions and encrypted xfs partitions are similarly
affected.


Cheers
Roland

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-16 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-15  3:02 xfs regression in linux_2.6.28, "XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO at line 3327 of file fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c" Roland Eggner
2009-01-15 22:14 ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-16  9:08   ` Roland Eggner [this message]
2009-01-17  7:25     ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-30  1:18       ` Roland Eggner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200901161008.02387.edvx1@systemanalysen.net \
    --to=edvx1@systemanalysen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.