From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:11:49 +0000 Subject: Re: Unknown CPU in 2.6.29-rc1 Message-Id: <200901161011.57560.dennis@ausil.us> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nextPart11232187.R1svTHGfOc" List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org --nextPart11232187.R1svTHGfOc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 16 January 2009 08:32:17 am you wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:58:32PM +0200, Meelis Roos wrote: > > After Sam's insw/... fix, todays 2.6.29-rc1+git boots up and seems fo > > work on E3500 with 2 USII-400's. However, the CPU has suddenly became > > unknown (it was known in 2.6.27): > > > > [ 136.434591] CPU: Unknown chip, impl[0x17] vers[0x11] > > [ 136.434649] FPU: Unknown chip, impl[0x17] vers[0x11] > > Did you expect: > CPU: TI UltraSparc II (BlackBird) > FPU: UltraSparc II integrated FPU > > Ohh, I see why. > The sucker that updated kernel/cpu.c did a poor job doing so. > (For reference: it was me) > > I assume manufacturer_info can be indexed but it needs to be searched. > Will likely fix tonight if you do not beat me. > > I think I know why I did this mistake, as I really did not make up > my mind what approach to use and ended up mixing it. > > [For the record I do not have a sparc to test it on. > My SUN Blade 100 are cauing me troubles..] if its locking up regularly try appending ide=nodma to the kernel line. Dennis --nextPart11232187.R1svTHGfOc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAklwsc0ACgkQkSxm47BaWfea9gCgpF3AM/vkA22llKFnHuT/WXmb nh4An3gw+r0OPhnho/xWBRz+9o3C5yeh =XeGA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart11232187.R1svTHGfOc--