From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix compile error in usb-musb.c Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:31:00 -0800 Message-ID: <200901161431.00469.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB02E6815B88@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <200901161327.52661.david-b@pacbell.net> <20090116221920.GC8189@frodo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.94]:44622 "HELO smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1763982AbZAPWbD (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:31:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090116221920.GC8189@frodo> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: me@felipebalbi.com Cc: Tony Lindgren , "Gadiyar, Anand" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" On Friday 16 January 2009, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 01:27:52PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > So why not just enable PM=y in the configuration? It's not > > actually required to do much, beyond not being broken. > > That patch would have to go through tony > > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/pm.h: > > #if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP730) && \ > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP15XX) && \ > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP16XX) && \ > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX) && \ > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP34XX) > #error "Power management for this processor not implemented yet" > #endif I didn't realize anyone outside of TI had their hands on OMAP4 chips yet. :)