All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <me@felipebalbi.com>
To: Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] omap mailbox: add initial omap3 support
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:43:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090116154357.GE32481@frodo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090116082711.17571.38818.stgit@oreo.research.nokia.com>

Hi Hiroshi,

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:27:11AM +0200, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
>  static inline void omap_init_mbox(void)
>  {
> +	if (cpu_is_omap2420()) {
> +		mbox_device.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(omap2_mbox_resources);
> +		mbox_device.resource = omap2_mbox_resources;
> +	} else if (cpu_is_omap3430()) {
> +		mbox_device.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(omap3_mbox_resources);
> +		mbox_device.resource = omap3_mbox_resources;
> +	} else {

how about a pr_info() or pr_err() here ?? Something like:
pr_err("%s: platform not supported yet\n", __func__);

> +		return;
> +	}
>  	platform_device_register(&mbox_device);
>  }
>  #else
>  static inline void omap_init_mbox(void) { }
> -#endif
> +#endif /* CONFIG_OMAP_MBOX_FWK */
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_OMAP_STI)
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
> index 0609e2d..3176bb7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
>  #define MAILBOX_IRQ_NEWMSG(u)		(1 << (2 * (u)))
>  #define MAILBOX_IRQ_NOTFULL(u)		(1 << (2 * (u) + 1))
>  
> -static unsigned long mbox_base;
> +static void __iomem *mbox_base;
>  
>  struct omap_mbox2_fifo {
>  	unsigned long msg;
> @@ -52,14 +52,14 @@ static struct clk *mbox_ick_handle;
>  static void omap2_mbox_enable_irq(struct omap_mbox *mbox,
>  				  omap_mbox_type_t irq);
>  
> -static inline unsigned int mbox_read_reg(unsigned int reg)
> +static inline unsigned int mbox_read_reg(size_t ofs)
>  {
> -	return __raw_readl(mbox_base + reg);
> +	return __raw_readl(mbox_base + ofs);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void mbox_write_reg(unsigned int val, unsigned int reg)
> +static inline void mbox_write_reg(u32 val, size_t ofs)
>  {
> -	__raw_writel(val, mbox_base + reg);
> +	__raw_writel(val, mbox_base + ofs);
>  }
>  
>  /* Mailbox H/W preparations */
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ struct omap_mbox mbox_dsp_info = {
>  };
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(mbox_dsp_info);
>  
> -/* IVA */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2420) /* IVA */

would be nice to have something like if (cpu_has_iva()) { ... } and move
this check to a later location e.g. on probe(), but this wouldn't prevent
this patch from going in now. Just a suggestion for later improvements.

>  static struct omap_mbox2_priv omap2_mbox_iva_priv = {
>  	.tx_fifo = {
>  		.msg		= MAILBOX_MESSAGE(2),
> @@ -229,17 +229,12 @@ static struct omap_mbox mbox_iva_info = {
>  	.ops	= &omap2_mbox_ops,
>  	.priv	= &omap2_mbox_iva_priv,
>  };
> +#endif

[snip]

> -	/* IVA IRQ */
> -	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 1);
> -	if (unlikely(!res)) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid irq resource\n");
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_dsp;
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2420) /* IVA */
> +	if (cpu_is_omap2420()) {
> +		/* IVA IRQ */
> +		res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 1);

platform_get_irq(pdev, 0) would look more standard, I think.

-- 
balbi

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-16 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-16  8:27 [PATCH 00/10] arm: omap mailbox: add omap3 support with some fixes Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-16  8:27 ` [PATCH 01/10] omap mailbox: cleanup omap2 register definition with macro Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-16  9:56   ` roel kluin
2009-01-16 12:15     ` Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-16 13:21       ` Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-16  8:27 ` [PATCH 02/10] omap mailbox: add initial omap3 support Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-16 15:43   ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2009-01-16  8:27 ` [PATCH 03/10] omap mailbox: print hardware revision at startup Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-16  8:27 ` [PATCH 04/10] omap mailbox: fix empty struct device for omap_mbox Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-16  8:27 ` [PATCH 05/10] omap mailbox: fix empty struct device for omap1 Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-28 14:49   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-01-28 15:29     ` Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-28 17:50       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-01-28 19:21         ` Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-28 19:41           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-01-16  8:27 ` [PATCH 06/10] omap mailbox: fix empty struct device for omap2 Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-16  8:27 ` [PATCH 07/10] omap mailbox: add save_/restore_ctx() for PM Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-17 17:10   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-01-17 17:20     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-01-17 17:20       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-01-19 10:36       ` Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-19 22:00         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-01-19 22:00           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-01-16  8:27 ` [PATCH 08/10] omap mailbox: move mailbox.h into mailbox.c Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-16  8:27 ` [PATCH 09/10] omap mailbox: convert sequence bit checking to module paramter Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-16  8:27 ` [PATCH 10/10] omap mailbox: remove unnecessary header file inclusion Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-30 18:57 ` [PATCH 00/10] arm: omap mailbox: add omap3 support with some fixes Tony Lindgren
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-25  9:39 [PATCH 0/10] omap mailbox driver update with omap3 support Hiroshi DOYU
2008-11-25  9:39 ` [PATCH 01/10] omap mailbox: cleanup omap2 register definition with macro Hiroshi DOYU
2008-11-25  9:39   ` [PATCH 02/10] omap mailbox: add initial omap3 support Hiroshi DOYU
2008-11-25 21:54     ` Tony Lindgren
2008-11-26  0:10       ` Hiroshi DOYU
2008-11-26 18:36         ` Tony Lindgren
2008-11-27 14:39           ` Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-21 20:02     ` Kanigeri, Hari
2009-01-21 22:45       ` Hiroshi DOYU
2009-01-22  5:12         ` Ramesh Gupta Guntha
2009-01-22  6:10           ` Hiroshi DOYU

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090116154357.GE32481@frodo \
    --to=me@felipebalbi.com \
    --cc=Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.