From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:21:07 +1100 Message-ID: <200901162121.09128.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> References: <20090115135236.GB29283@parisc-linux.org> <84144f020901160216q17f1b558q955d5b8fb7c528c0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp109.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.219]:49088 "HELO smtp109.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932126AbZAPKVb (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:21:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <84144f020901160216q17f1b558q955d5b8fb7c528c0@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , "Wilcox, Matthew R" , chinang.ma@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sharad.c.tripathi@intel.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, andi.kleen@intel.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, harita.chilukuri@intel.com, douglas.w.styner@intel.com, peter.xihong.wang@intel.com, hubert.nueckel@intel.com, chris.mason@oracle.com, srostedt@redhat.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Vasquez , Anirban Chakraborty , Christoph Lameter On Friday 16 January 2009 21:16:31 Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:46:09AM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > >> It would also be nice if someone could do the performance analysis on > >> the SLUB bug. I ran sysbench in oltp mode here and the results look > >> like this: > >> > >> [ number of transactions per second from 10 runs. ] > >> > >> min max avg sd > >> 2.6.29-rc1-slab 833.77 852.32 845.10 4.72 > >> 2.6.29-rc1-slub 823.61 851.94 836.74 8.57 > I had lockdep enabled in my config so I ran the tests again with > x86-64 defconfig and I'm back to square one: > > [ number of transactions per second from 10 runs, bigger is better ] > > min max avg sd > 2.6.29-rc1-slab 802.02 805.37 803.93 0.97 > 2.6.29-rc1-slub 807.78 811.20 809.86 1.05 Hm, I wonder why it is going slower with lockdep disabled? Did something else change?