From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LO09s-0005e0-VY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:39:33 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LO09r-0005dn-HT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:39:32 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49106 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LO09r-0005dk-Bo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:39:31 -0500 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]:10974) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LO09q-0007h9-Ra for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:39:31 -0500 Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090117013921.ESTM7670.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:39:21 +0000 Received: from miranda.arrow ([213.107.23.205]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090117013921.LRNX2093.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@miranda.arrow> for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:39:21 +0000 Received: from sdb by miranda.arrow with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LO09f-0003tU-Az for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:39:19 +0000 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:39:19 +0000 From: Stuart Brady Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Support epoch of 1980 in RTC emulation for MIPS Magnum Message-ID: <20090117013919.GA14281@miranda.arrow> References: <20090111173701.GA5213@miranda.arrow> <20090111.104733.-974214510.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090111.104733.-974214510.imp@bsdimp.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:47:33AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20090111173701.GA5213@miranda.arrow> > Stuart Brady writes: > : I've not modified the handling of the century byte, as I'm not entirely > : sure what's required. With an epoch of 1980 and a year of 2009, you > : could argue that the century byte should hold either 0, 1, 19 or 20. > > What does WinNT/mips expect? I've been informed that WinNT 3.50/MIPS does not read the century byte, and I expect that other versions do the same, as an epoch of 1980 will won't break until 2080. Cheers, -- Stuart Brady