From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
Don Ash <donash4@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] e1000e: drop lltx, remove unnecessary lock
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:17:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090120001708.22703.8019.stgit@lost.foo-projects.org> (raw)
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
LLTX is deprecated and complicated, don't use it. It was observed by Don Ash
<donash4@gmail.com> that e1000e was acquiring this lock in the NAPI cleanup
path. This is obviously a bug, as this is a leftover from when e1000
supported multiple tx queues and fake netdevs.
another user reported this to us and tested routing with the 2.6.27 kernel and
this patch and reported a 3.5 % improvement in packets forwarded in a
multi-port test on 82571 parts.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
CC: Don Ash <donash4@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h | 2 --
drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c | 34 +++-------------------------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h b/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h
index 37bcb19..28bf9a5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h
@@ -195,8 +195,6 @@ struct e1000_adapter {
u16 link_duplex;
u16 eeprom_vers;
- spinlock_t tx_queue_lock; /* prevent concurrent tail updates */
-
/* track device up/down/testing state */
unsigned long state;
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
index 91817d0..c4fe653 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
#include "e1000.h"
-#define DRV_VERSION "0.3.3.3-k6"
+#define DRV_VERSION "0.3.3.4-k2"
char e1000e_driver_name[] = "e1000e";
const char e1000e_driver_version[] = DRV_VERSION;
@@ -1698,7 +1698,6 @@ int e1000e_setup_tx_resources(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
tx_ring->next_to_use = 0;
tx_ring->next_to_clean = 0;
- spin_lock_init(&adapter->tx_queue_lock);
return 0;
err:
@@ -2007,16 +2006,7 @@ static int e1000_clean(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
!(adapter->rx_ring->ims_val & adapter->tx_ring->ims_val))
goto clean_rx;
- /*
- * e1000_clean is called per-cpu. This lock protects
- * tx_ring from being cleaned by multiple cpus
- * simultaneously. A failure obtaining the lock means
- * tx_ring is currently being cleaned anyway.
- */
- if (spin_trylock(&adapter->tx_queue_lock)) {
- tx_cleaned = e1000_clean_tx_irq(adapter);
- spin_unlock(&adapter->tx_queue_lock);
- }
+ tx_cleaned = e1000_clean_tx_irq(adapter);
clean_rx:
adapter->clean_rx(adapter, &work_done, budget);
@@ -2922,8 +2912,6 @@ static int __devinit e1000_sw_init(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
if (e1000_alloc_queues(adapter))
return -ENOMEM;
- spin_lock_init(&adapter->tx_queue_lock);
-
/* Explicitly disable IRQ since the NIC can be in any state. */
e1000_irq_disable(adapter);
@@ -4069,7 +4057,6 @@ static int e1000_xmit_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev)
unsigned int max_txd_pwr = E1000_MAX_TXD_PWR;
unsigned int tx_flags = 0;
unsigned int len = skb->len - skb->data_len;
- unsigned long irq_flags;
unsigned int nr_frags;
unsigned int mss;
int count = 0;
@@ -4138,18 +4125,12 @@ static int e1000_xmit_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev)
if (adapter->hw.mac.tx_pkt_filtering)
e1000_transfer_dhcp_info(adapter, skb);
- if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&adapter->tx_queue_lock, irq_flags))
- /* Collision - tell upper layer to requeue */
- return NETDEV_TX_LOCKED;
-
/*
* need: count + 2 desc gap to keep tail from touching
* head, otherwise try next time
*/
- if (e1000_maybe_stop_tx(netdev, count + 2)) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->tx_queue_lock, irq_flags);
+ if (e1000_maybe_stop_tx(netdev, count + 2))
return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
- }
if (adapter->vlgrp && vlan_tx_tag_present(skb)) {
tx_flags |= E1000_TX_FLAGS_VLAN;
@@ -4161,7 +4142,6 @@ static int e1000_xmit_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev)
tso = e1000_tso(adapter, skb);
if (tso < 0) {
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->tx_queue_lock, irq_flags);
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
@@ -4182,7 +4162,6 @@ static int e1000_xmit_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev)
if (count < 0) {
/* handle pci_map_single() error in e1000_tx_map */
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->tx_queue_lock, irq_flags);
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
@@ -4193,7 +4172,6 @@ static int e1000_xmit_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev)
/* Make sure there is space in the ring for the next send. */
e1000_maybe_stop_tx(netdev, MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->tx_queue_lock, irq_flags);
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
@@ -4922,12 +4900,6 @@ static int __devinit e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
if (pci_using_dac)
netdev->features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;
- /*
- * We should not be using LLTX anymore, but we are still Tx faster with
- * it.
- */
- netdev->features |= NETIF_F_LLTX;
-
if (e1000e_enable_mng_pass_thru(&adapter->hw))
adapter->flags |= FLAG_MNG_PT_ENABLED;
next reply other threads:[~2009-01-20 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-20 0:17 Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2009-01-20 0:52 ` [PATCH] e1000e: drop lltx, remove unnecessary lock David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090120001708.22703.8019.stgit@lost.foo-projects.org \
--to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donash4@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.