diff for duplicates of <20090120143257.GA21073@infradead.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 3e66b85..b70cba8 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -9,8 +9,3 @@ On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:23:01PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
 
 Yeah, it's more of a hack.  If you drop the patch and just enable
 CONFIG_LBD it should be fine.
-
-_______________________________________________
-xfs mailing list
-xfs@oss.sgi.com
-http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 15ffbb5..05061b2 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
  "Cc\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>"
   Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
   LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
- " xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>\0"
+  xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
+ " Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:23:01PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:\n"
@@ -28,11 +29,6 @@
  "> /dev/sda7              45G   44G  1.2G  98% /MAGAZYN\n"
  "\n"
  "Yeah, it's more of a hack.  If you drop the patch and just enable\n"
- "CONFIG_LBD it should be fine.\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "xfs mailing list\n"
- "xfs@oss.sgi.com\n"
- http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
+ CONFIG_LBD it should be fine.
 
-be01b08c16715eb8152e36c5c30ec1bc2590f021fbf92cab3ce4a41fbf52e66b
+032f72fdaf583624e87e34dfb93307427b8bca40e6dfa57ac1e8ab601411515f
