From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Bernd Schubert <bs@q-leap.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>,
debian-user@lists.debian.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Corrupt data - RAID sata_sil 3114 chip
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:07:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090120200741.GA1020@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49753BDE.8050403@shaw.ca>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:50:06PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > Given the corruption happens at high block numbers, I'm wondering
> > if maybe there's some kind of wraparound bug happening here.
> > (Though why only the 0x00 pattern fails would still be a mystery).
>
> Yeah, that seems a bit bizarre.. Apparently somehow zeros are being
> converted into non-zero.. Can you try zeroing out the partition by
> dd'ing into it from /dev/zero or something, then dumping it back out to
> see what kind of data is showing up?
Hmm, it seems the failed firmware update has killed the eeprom.
It no longer reports the right PCI vendor ID.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-20 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-03 20:04 Corrupt data - RAID sata_sil 3114 chip Bernd Schubert
2009-01-03 20:53 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-03 21:11 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-01-03 23:23 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-07 4:59 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-07 5:38 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-07 15:31 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-01-11 0:32 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-11 0:43 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-12 1:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-19 18:43 ` Dave Jones
2009-01-20 2:50 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-20 20:07 ` Dave Jones [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-29 16:13 Ulli.Brennenstuhl
2010-01-29 19:37 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-06 3:54 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-06 15:16 ` Tim Small
2010-02-07 16:09 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-08 2:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-08 14:25 ` Tim Small
[not found] <bQVFb-3SB-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bQVFb-3SB-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bQVFb-3SB-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bQVFc-3SB-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bQVFc-3SB-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bQVFc-3SB-47@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bQVFb-3SB-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4963306F.4060504@sm7jqb.se>
2009-01-06 10:48 ` Justin Piszcz
[not found] <495E01E3.9060903@sm7jqb.se>
2009-01-02 12:42 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-02 21:30 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-01-02 21:47 ` Twigathy
2009-01-03 2:31 ` Redeeman
2009-01-03 13:13 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-01-03 13:39 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-03 16:20 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-01-03 18:31 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-03 22:19 ` James Youngman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090120200741.GA1020@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bs@q-leap.de \
--cc=debian-user@lists.debian.org \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.