From: W. van den Akker <listsrv@wilsoft.nl>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] still same problem
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:15:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901211815.41755.listsrv@wilsoft.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232541342.6354.9.camel@jm-desktop>
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 02:11 -0800, W. van den Akker wrote:
> > I have tested with 1 CPU disabled. Running now for about 2 hours without
> > hangups (I have several connection drops, but it will reconnect).
> >
> > I have also tested with 2 CPU's and HT-disabled (noht parameter) but that
> > had no effect.
> >
> > So SMP looks like the cause of the problem here.
>
> Thanks for testing this! I'm running most of my tests with a dual core
> system, so SMP is being used, but with two cores, not two separate
> chips. I don't think there should be much difference there, but
> certainly our hardware configuration is different.
>
> Could you please describe your hardware with more details so that we can
> see whether we could find a similar system to try to reproduce this? Is
> this the IBM 206 eserver with WMP300N you mentioned in an earlier
> message in the thread? That seems to be (by default) a uni-processor
> setup, so I would like to make sure we understand what is the exact
> hardware used here since I do not think we have been able to reproduce
> this type of issue so far in any dual core systems.
>
Its indeed an IBM eServer x206 8482-2RX with a WMP300N (Linksys,
Atheros Communications Inc. AR5416 802.11abgn Wireless PCI Adapter (rev 01).
The IBM is a dual-core system with 2 CPU's on one fysical CPU-chip (its boxed
so I am not for sure).
/proc/cpuinfo shows (with one CPU disabled)
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 3
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
stepping : 4
cpu MHz : 3000.473
cache size : 1024 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe constant_tsc
up pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl cid xtpr
bogomips : 6000.94
clflush size : 64
power management:
lscpi -vvv for the adapter shows:
03:02.0 Network controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR5416 802.11abgn
Wireless PCI Adapter (rev 01)
Subsystem: Linksys Device 0061
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr+
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 168, Cache Line Size: 32 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 25
Region 0: Memory@d0200000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
Capabilities: [40] #80 [0000]
Kernel driver in use: ath9k
Kernel modules: ath9k
If more information is needed I am happy to provide.
Greetings,
Willem
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-21 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-04 1:26 [ath9k-devel] still same problem Dmitri Seletski
2009-01-04 1:53 ` Barry Green
2009-01-04 3:34 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-01-04 9:58 ` Jens Ott - Opteamax
2009-01-05 16:09 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-01-17 23:55 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-18 1:41 ` Jens Ott - Opteamax
2009-01-18 9:14 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-18 5:17 ` Dmitri Seletski
2009-01-18 9:34 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-18 15:16 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-01-19 8:35 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-19 22:31 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-20 17:48 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-01-20 18:32 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-20 22:22 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-20 23:08 ` Chris Kennedy
2009-01-21 7:54 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-21 10:11 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-21 12:35 ` Jouni Malinen
2009-01-21 17:01 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] " Chris Kennedy
2009-01-21 21:05 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-27 9:30 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-27 21:47 ` Chris Kennedy
2009-01-21 17:15 ` W. van den Akker [this message]
2009-01-21 10:17 ` [ath9k-devel] " W. van den Akker
2009-01-04 10:33 ` W. van den Akker
2009-01-04 10:47 ` W. van den Akker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901211815.41755.listsrv@wilsoft.nl \
--to=listsrv@wilsoft.nl \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.