From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: bharrosh@panasas.com, dougg@torque.net,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, osd-dev@open-osd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bsg: Add support for submitting requests at tail of queue
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:13:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090122111302.GG30821@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090122082314G.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On Thu, Jan 22 2009, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:52:39 +0200
> Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Currently inherited from sg.c bsg will submit asynchronous request
> > at the head-of-the-queue, (using "at_head" set in the call to
> > blk_execute_rq_nowait()). This is bad in situation where we want
> > to keep the queues full but need the requests to execute in order.
>
> As I wrote, I think that blk_execute_rq_nowait inserts a request and
> plugs a queue. So how can you keep the queue full? On the completion
> of blk_execute_rq_nowait, the queue is empty.
That's not true at all. If you submit more than one request, request 2
and up would be queued according to the orientation given. It may even
include request 1 as well, what if the queue is busy doing work for
someone else already?
I think the patch makes sense, I also wish that the default would have
been reversed so that at_back would be the default. at_back is more
complex though, since it impacts existing requests for the device (it
drains the scheduler queue).
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-22 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 9:52 [PATCH] bsg: Add support for submitting requests at tail of queue Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-21 23:24 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-01-22 8:57 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-22 11:13 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-01-22 12:44 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-22 12:46 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-22 22:03 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-01-22 22:27 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-23 6:14 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-01-25 9:17 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-25 9:41 ` [PATCH version2] " Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-25 9:44 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-25 10:07 ` [PATCH version 3] " Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090122111302.GG30821@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.