From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [82.208.44.173] (helo=ibawizard.net)
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ynezz@ibawizard.net>) id 1LQKpE-0006rm-Jp
	for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:07:52 +0100
Received: by ibawizard.net (Postfix, from userid 1002)
	id 2591916C001; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:00:30 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:00:30 +0100
From: Petr Stetiar <ynezz@true.cz>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Message-ID: <20090123120029.GB19349@ibawizard.net>
References: <200901230131.09511.mickey@vanille-media.de>
	<87wscmn8ne.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br>
	<49799C30.90508@epfl.ch> <glc8ce$eoh$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <glc8ce$eoh$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Subject: Re: Mailinglists, was: Re: Bugtracker Status
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:07:55 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> [2009-01-23 12:06:54]:

> On 23-01-09 11:30, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
> >I would definitely support a patch review style like on the linux kernel
> >mailing-lists even if this implies a high-traffic list (with simple
> >filter rules in your mail client, it's easy to handle). However, I don't
> >think it would be a good idea to have two lists.
> 
> I'd go even further by saying we should reorganize the mailinglists into 
> this:
> 
> * oe mailinglist for humans
> * combined commit + autobuild log list for non-humans
> 
> That should reduce confusion which list to use (oe-user, oe-devel, etc) 
> for sending mails and more people get to see patches flying by. Even if 
> you don't review them having more code snippets on the list is usefull 
> for newcomers.

That would be awesome.

-- ynezz