From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] dead lock (?) occur on ap325 board
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:32:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090127083231.GA7407@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uprie4cmj.wl%morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 05:26:46PM +0900, morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com wrote:
>
> Dear Paul
>
> > I haven't been able to reproduce this yet, but it would be helpful to
> > know precisely where your lock up occurs. If you aren't using JTAG, you
> > can try sending an NMI, or send a register and/or stacktrace request via
> > magic sysrq.
>
> I think I found the reason.
>
> in "__mutex_fastpath_unlock" (arch/sh/include/asm/mutex-llsc.h),
> currect operation is following.
>
> -------------------
> __res |= !__ex_flag;
> if (unlikely(__res <= 0))
> -------------------
>
> But, This operation is wrong for me.
> I think following is correct ?
>
> -------------------
> if (unlikely(__res <= 0 || __ex_flag = 0))
> -------------------
>
> above patch works well and dead lock never occur
> on my local environment.
> If my opinion is correct, I will send patch.
>
Hmm, the !__ex_flag should have handled that case properly, but I wonder
if it is negated in the unlock case. Does switching to __res |= __ex_flag
and leaving the existing test as-is fix it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-27 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-23 9:04 [bug report] dead lock (?) occur on ap325 board morimoto.kuninori
2009-01-26 2:20 ` Paul Mundt
2009-01-26 5:01 ` morimoto.kuninori
2009-01-27 8:26 ` morimoto.kuninori
2009-01-27 8:32 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2009-01-27 8:46 ` morimoto.kuninori
2009-01-27 8:49 ` Paul Mundt
2009-01-28 1:25 ` morimoto.kuninori
2009-01-28 9:29 ` Takashi Yoshii
2009-01-28 10:03 ` Paul Mundt
2009-01-29 0:34 ` yoshii.takashi
2009-01-29 23:54 ` morimoto.kuninori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090127083231.GA7407@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.