From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:56:54 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] spam Message-Id: <20090127095654.32dade08@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <537C6C0940C6C143AA46A88946B8541710A4164D@ORNLEXCHANGE.ornl.gov> In-Reply-To: <537C6C0940C6C143AA46A88946B8541710A4164D@ORNLEXCHANGE.ornl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi Axel, On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:34:20 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:15:33PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I have already asked our administrator (Axel, Cc'd) to erase this > > offending spam from our mailing list archive. And now, Axel, please > > _also_ remove this post from Line, as she quoted the message in its > > entirety :( > > Actually the spam was recogniyed at level 3.0, but the filters deny at > 5.0 and above. Maybe we should lower the spam barrier (which would hit > a couple of false positives, but better to get an email a month denied > than be spammed that way). Thanks for deleting the offending message. There's one more to delete here: http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2009-January/025201.html I've blacklisted that specific sender so hopefully we will no longer be harmed by similar message... as long as the sender doesn't change. I am OK with lowering the spam barrier as long as the messages in question are either rejected or held for moderation, but not discarded. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors