From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: scsi_host_template.proc_name for ibmvscsic Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:11:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20090127141107.GA15401@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:35205 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751423AbZA0OLJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:11:09 -0500 Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1738444BC4 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:11:08 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org /sys/class/scsi_host/host0/proc_name should map to the drivers module name according to Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt But this is not the case for drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c, drivers/scsi/a100u2w.c, drivers/scsi/a2091.c and others. Is it safe to fix at least ibmvscsi.c to have ibmvscsic as ->proc_name? Olaf