From: Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>
To: llvmdev@cs.uiuc.edu
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Török Edwin" <edwintorok@gmail.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] inline asm semantics: output constraint width smaller than input
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:42:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901272042.57272.baldrick@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090124172758.GA31699@elte.hu>
Hi,
> If yes then this doesnt look all that bad or invasive at first sight (if
> the put_user() workaround can be expressed in a cleaner way), but in any
> case it would be nice to hear an LLVM person's opinion about roughly when
> this is going to be solved in LLVM itself.
one thing that seems to be clear to everyone except me is... what are the
semantics supposed to be? [My understanding is that what is being discussed
is when you have an asm with a register as input and output, but with integer
types of different width for the input and output, but I saw some mention of
struct types in this thread...]. Presumably this is something obvious, but
it would be good to have someone spell it out in small words that even someone
like me can understand :)
Thanks,
Duncan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-27 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-23 17:57 inline asm semantics: output constraint width smaller than input Török Edwin
2009-01-23 18:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-23 18:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-23 18:27 ` Török Edwin
2009-01-23 18:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-23 18:52 ` Török Edwin
2009-01-23 20:42 ` Török Edwin
2009-01-24 16:23 ` Török Edwin
2009-01-24 17:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-24 18:57 ` Török Edwin
2009-01-24 21:25 ` [LLVMdev] " Mike Stump
2009-01-24 19:23 ` Chris Lattner
2009-01-24 21:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-27 19:42 ` Duncan Sands [this message]
2009-01-27 21:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-28 1:45 ` Kyle Moffett
2009-01-28 1:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-28 13:28 ` Kyle Moffett
2009-01-28 17:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-28 19:27 ` Kyle Moffett
2009-01-28 20:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-24 20:07 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901272042.57272.baldrick@free.fr \
--to=baldrick@free.fr \
--cc=edwintorok@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvmdev@cs.uiuc.edu \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.