From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Sam Liddicott <sam@liddicott.com>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "permanently" unbind a device from a driver?
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:19:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090128061940.GA14275@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49779284.50603@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:24:20AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 05:20:45PM -0000, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> >> * Greg KH wrote, On 21/01/09 16:23:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:44:03PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> 2009/1/21 Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Just add a blacklist rule to the usbhid driver for this device. There
> >>>>> are a number of devices out there that need this functionality, which is
> >>>>> why there is such a list.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Is it possible to implement a generic blacklist mechanism in driver core
> >>>> to support the function for all kinds of drivers? or is it necessary to do that?
> >>>>
> >>> It's not necessary as the hid core already supports this very thing due
> >>> to the need for it (it's the easiest way to write a userspace Windows
> >>> driver, so lots of manufacturers lie about their devices in order to
> >>> work around having to write a Windows kernel driver.)
> >>>
> >>> So just add this device to the hid core blacklist, and you are all set.
> >>>
> >>> Care to send a patch?
>
> Ok, I'm looking at this now, but have a question:
> which quirk code(s)/bits should I use for that?
> Assuming the table in question is in
> drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-quirks.c
> file.
> What's needed is to stop usbhid module from claiming this device in the
> first place.
No, add the device to the hid_ignore_list[] table in
drivers/hid/hid-core.c.
> >> I've often felt that a /proc or /sys interface to allow blacklist
> >> additions or quirk addition would be great.
> >
> > Some subsystems support this, like the HID subsystem :)
>
> Oh, I didn't know. In fact, that's exactly what I was asking in my
> first email in this thread - to have some module parameter or a sysfs
> file which can be touched to stop the module from claiming the device.
> This also helps to debug it, to know the right bits to use.. which I
> don't know... ;)
There is some way to do this, but I can't recall how at the moment. Try
asking the HID maintainer about this.
good luck,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-28 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-20 20:50 "permanently" unbind a device from a driver? Michael Tokarev
2009-01-20 21:02 ` Greg KH
2009-01-21 15:44 ` Ming Lei
2009-01-21 16:23 ` Greg KH
2009-01-21 17:20 ` Sam Liddicott
2009-01-21 18:11 ` Greg KH
2009-01-21 21:24 ` Michael Tokarev
2009-01-28 6:19 ` Greg KH [this message]
2009-01-29 9:43 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-01-22 2:31 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090128061940.GA14275@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=sam@liddicott.com \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.